Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

21 March 2006

• 00:38   Re: update == delete + insert? Jaime Casanova
• 01:57   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Mark Kirkwood
• 02:51   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Mark Kirkwood
• 05:06   Perfomance test figures Amit Soni
• 07:25   Re: Query Feromance Marco Furetto
• 07:40   Re: Query Feromance Thomas Pundt
• 08:50   Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, advices to tweak cost constants? Jim C. Nasby
• 08:56   Re: Query Feromance Marco Furetto
• 08:57   Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, advices to tweak cost constants? Jim C. Nasby
• 08:59   Re: partitioning Jim C. Nasby
• 09:04   Re: partial indexes and inference Jim C. Nasby
• 09:05   Re: data doesnt get saved in the database / idle in transaction Jim C. Nasby
• 09:08   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Jim C. Nasby
• 09:13   Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, advices to tweak cost constants? Guillaume Cottenceau
• 09:23   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Jim C. Nasby
• 09:32   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec RAID 2200S Jim C. Nasby
• 09:40   Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, Mark Kirkwood
• 09:55   Re: Query Feromance Thomas Pundt
• 10:03   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec Mark Kirkwood
• 10:23   Re: update == delete + insert? Jim C. Nasby
• 10:28   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Jim C. Nasby
• 10:35   Re: Auto performance tuning? Jim C. Nasby
• 10:38   Re: Perfomance test figures Jim C. Nasby
• 10:47   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec Jim C. Nasby
• 10:49   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Jim C. Nasby
• 10:51   Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, Jim C. Nasby
• 10:52   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Csaba Nagy
• 10:55   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Steinar H. Gunderson
• 10:58   Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, advices to tweak cost constants? Jim C. Nasby
• 10:59   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Csaba Nagy
• 11:01   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Jim C. Nasby
• 11:09   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Steinar H. Gunderson
• 11:18   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Jim C. Nasby
• 11:22   WAL logging of SELECT ... INTO command Jim C. Nasby
• 11:22   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec Alex Hayward
• 11:29   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Steinar H. Gunderson
• 11:34   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec Jim C. Nasby
• 11:45   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Jim C. Nasby
• 11:48   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Michael Stone
• 11:51   Postmaster using only 4-5% CPU Edoardo Serra
• 12:03   Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, Guillaume Cottenceau
• 12:30   Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, advices to tweak cost constants? Guillaume Cottenceau
• 13:03   Re: Perfomance test figures Merlin Moncure
• 13:11   Re: Postmaster using only 4-5% CPU Markus Bertheau
• 13:12   Re: update == delete + insert? Merlin Moncure
• 13:34   Re: Postmaster using only 4-5% CPU Guillaume Cottenceau
• 14:25   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Luke Lonergan
• 14:33   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec Vivek Khera
• 14:34   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec Vivek Khera
• 14:40   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adam Witney
• 15:57   Re: PostgreSQL and Xeon MP Guillaume Smet
• 16:38   Re: update == delete + insert? Jim C. Nasby
• 16:44   Re: Postmaster using only 4-5% CPU Scott Marlowe
• 16:46   Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, advices to tweak cost constants? Jim C. Nasby
• 16:49   Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, Jim C. Nasby
• 16:59   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Jim C. Nasby
• 17:10   Sequence Scan vs. Index scan Fernando Lujan
• 17:16   Re: Sequence Scan vs. Index scan Steinar H. Gunderson
• 17:22   Re: Sequence Scan vs. Index scan Mikael Carneholm
• 17:23   Re: Sequence Scan vs. Index scan Reimer
• 18:04   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec PFC
• 18:14   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Mark Kirkwood
• 18:22   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Jeff Frost
• 19:08   Re: qsort again (was Re: Strange Create Index behaviour) Tom Lane
• 19:32   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec Vivek Khera
• 19:34   Re: WAL logging of SELECT ... INTO command Simon Riggs
• 19:45   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Simon Riggs
• 19:58   Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, Simon Riggs
• 20:15   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Ron
• 20:19   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Scott Marlowe
• 20:20   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Alvaro Herrera
• 20:56   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Tom Lane
• 21:23   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance Scott Marlowe
• 21:44   Poor performance o Craig A. James
• 22:33   Re: Poor performance o Tom Lane