Re: update == delete + insert? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: update == delete + insert?
Date
Msg-id b42b73150603210612q65eebe9fu4c45698eddd75575@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: update == delete + insert?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Responses Re: update == delete + insert?
List pgsql-performance
> > design 1 is normalized and better
> > design 2 is denormalized and a bad approach no matter the RDBMS
>
> How is design 1 denormalized?

It isn't :)...he said it is normalized.  Design 2 may or may not be
de-normalized (IMO there is not enough information to make that
determination) but as stated it's a good idea to split the table on
practical grounds.

merlin

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Markus Bertheau"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postmaster using only 4-5% CPU
Next
From: Guillaume Cottenceau
Date:
Subject: Re: Postmaster using only 4-5% CPU