Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

6 December 2005

• 00:21   Re: BLCKSZ Ron
• 02:07   Re: 15,000 tables - next step Jan Wieck
• 02:58   Re: two disks - best way to use them? David Lang
• 04:51   Re: BLCKSZ Tom Lane
• 04:52   Re: two disks - best way to use them? Thomas Harold
• 07:12   Re: two disks - best way to use them? Ron
• 07:54   Re: [GENERAL] need help Tino Wildenhain
• 08:09   Re: Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's Assaf Yaari
• 08:22   Memory Leakage Problem Kathy Lo
• 08:39   LVM and Postgres Rory Campbell-Lange
• 08:43   Can this query go faster??? Joost Kraaijeveld
• 08:52   Re: Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's Pandurangan R S
• 08:52   Re: Can this query go faster??? Michael Riess
• 08:54   Re: Can this query go faster??? Csaba Nagy
• 08:55   Re: Can this query go faster??? Markus Wollny
• 09:21   Re: Can this query go faster??? Joost Kraaijeveld
• 09:32   Re: Can this query go faster??? Tino Wildenhain
• 09:40   Re: BLCKSZ Olleg
• 09:59   Re: BLCKSZ Steinar H. Gunderson
• 10:21   Re: Can this query go faster??? Joost Kraaijeveld
• 10:36   Re: Can this query go faster??? Tino Wildenhain
• 10:42   Re: BLCKSZ David Lang
• 11:20   Re: Can this query go faster??? Joost Kraaijeveld
• 11:30   Re: Can this query go faster??? Tino Wildenhain
• 11:35   Re: Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's Jan Wieck
• 11:42   Re: Can this query go faster??? Csaba Nagy
• 12:41   Re: Can this query go faster??? Ron
• 12:58   Re: Can this query go faster??? Merlin Moncure
• 13:46   Re: Memory Leakage Problem Tom Lane
• 15:00   Re: two disks - best way to use them? Thomas Harold
• 15:20   Re: 8.1 count(*) distinct: IndexScan/SeqScan Pailloncy Jean-Gerard
• 15:48   TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene Joshua Kramer
• 15:57   Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join? Tom Lane
• 15:59   Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene Michael Riess
• 16:14   Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene Oleg Bartunov
• 16:27   Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene Bruce Momjian
• 16:44   postgresql performance tuning Ameet Kini
• 16:48   Re: Memory Leakage Problem Scott Marlowe
• 17:02   Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene Tom Lane
• 17:04   Re: postgresql performance tuning Tom Lane
• 17:28   Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene Michael Riess
• 17:32   Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene Bruce Momjian
• 17:33   Re: postgresql performance tuning Vivek Khera
• 18:04   Re: High context switches occurring Anjan Dave
• 18:20   postgresql performance tuning Ameet Kini
• 18:26   Re: High context switches occurring Vivek Khera
• 19:07   Re: postgresql performance tuning Vivek Khera
• 19:11   Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join? Ron Mayer
• 19:12   Re: LVM and Postgres August Zajonc
• 19:33   Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join? Tom Lane
• 19:35   Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene Russell Garrett
• 19:40   Re: Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's Bruno Wolff III
• 19:46   Re: Can this query go faster??? Bruno Wolff III
• 19:49   Re: postgresql performance tuning Alan Stange
• 20:02   Re: postgresql performance tuning Michael Riess
• 20:08   Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join? Ron Mayer
• 20:22   Re: postgresql performance tuning Tom Lane
• 20:22   Context switching and Xeon processors Brandon Metcalf
• 20:26   Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join? Tom Lane
• 20:38   Re: Context switching and Xeon processors Tom Lane
• 20:38   Re: LVM and Postgres Rory Campbell-Lange
• 20:38   Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join? Ron Mayer
• 20:40   Re: postgresql performance tuning Alan Stange
• 20:45   Re: Context switching and Xeon processors Brandon Metcalf
• 20:52   Re: Context switching and Xeon processors Steinar H. Gunderson
• 21:00   Re: two disks - best way to use them? David Lang
• 21:03   Re: postgresql performance tuning Ameet Kini
• 22:45   Re: High context switches occurring Tom Lane
• 23:23   Re: postgresql performance tuning Michael Stone
• 23:25   Re: LVM and Postgres Michael Stone
• 23:52   Re: LVM and Postgres Alex Turner