Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

5 December 2005

• 02:20   Dividing up a single 250GB RAID10 server for postgres Rory Campbell-Lange
• 09:29   Re: Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0 Markus Wollny
• 12:47   BLCKSZ Olleg Samoylov
• 12:56   Re: two disks - best way to use them? Olleg Samoylov
• 13:32   Re: Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0 Tom Lane
• 13:44   Re: Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0 Markus Wollny
• 14:02   Re: BLCKSZ Tom Lane
• 14:11   Re: Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0 Tom Lane
• 14:40   Re: Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0 Markus Wollny
• 14:45   Re: Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0 Markus Wollny
• 14:47   Re: two disks - best way to use them? Thomas Harold
• 15:18   Re: two disks - best way to use them? David Lang
• 15:45   Re: two disks - best way to use them? Thomas Harold
• 18:27   Re: Best hardware Mirjam (sent by Nabble.com)
• 19:17   Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's Assaf Yaari
• 19:31   Re: Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's Bruno Wolff III
• 21:11   Missed index opportunity for outer join? rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com
• 21:32   Re: BLCKSZ Olleg
• 21:38   Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join? Tom Lane
• 22:04   Re: Missed index opportunity for outer join? rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com
• 23:07   Re: BLCKSZ Alvaro Herrera