Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

21 December 2005

• 01:50   Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1? David Lang
• 04:01   effizient query with jdbc Bühler, Johannes
• 04:01   effizient query with jdbc Bühler, Johannes
• 04:01   effizient query with jdbc Johannes Bühler
• 04:01   Re: Simple Join Mitchell Skinner
• 04:02   SAN/NAS options Charles Sprickman
• 04:02   effizient query with jdbc johannesbuehler@oderbruecke.de
• 04:02   Speed of different procedural language Ben Trewern
• 04:03   Re: [postgis-users] Is my query planner failing me,or vice versa? Mark Cave-Ayland
• 04:58   Re: SAN/NAS options Charles Sprickman
• 05:55   Re: Simple Join Mark Kirkwood
• 08:05   Windows performance again Josep Maria Pinyol Fontseca
• 09:04   Re: Windows performance again Richard Huxton
• 09:17   Re: SAN/NAS options Alex Stapleton
• 09:37   Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1? Antal Attila
• 09:47   Re: SAN/NAS options Luke Lonergan
• 10:06   Re: Speed of different procedural language Steinar H. Gunderson
• 10:25   Re: [GENERAL] need help Alban Medici \(NetCentrex\)
• 11:10   Re: 2 phase commit: performance implications? Andy Ballingall
• 13:48   Re: Windows performance again Greg Stark
• 15:10   Re: Windows performance again Tom Lane
• 17:02   Wrong index used when ORDER BY LIMIT 1 Szűcs Gábor
• 17:16   ORDER BY costs Carlos Benkendorf
• 17:40   Re: Windows performance again Merlin Moncure
• 17:51   Re: Wrong index used when ORDER BY LIMIT 1 Michael Fuhr
• 18:34   Re: Wrong index used when ORDER BY LIMIT 1 Tom Lane
• 18:39   Re: ORDER BY costs Tom Lane
• 19:43   Re: Speed of different procedural language Merlin Moncure
• 20:24   Re: Speed of different procedural language Michael Fuhr
• 20:38   Re: Speed of different procedural language Steinar H. Gunderson
• 21:10   Re: Speed of different procedural language Michael Fuhr
• 22:57   Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1? William Yu
• 23:35   Re: ORDER BY costs Carlos Benkendorf