Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

1 December 2005

• 02:55   Query is 800 times slower when running in function! Ralph Mason
• 02:58   Re: RES: pg_dump slow Ron
• 03:58   Re: Query is 800 times slower when running in function! Tom Lane
• 04:58   About the relation between fragmentation of file and VACUUM Tatsumi Abe
• 09:05   Re: About the relation between fragmentation of file and Richard Huxton
• 10:32   pg_dump slow Franklin Haut
• 11:00   Re: About the relation between fragmentation of file and Michael Stone
• 11:44   Re: About the relation between fragmentation of file and VACUUM Bill McGonigle
• 12:34   slow insert into very large table Wolfgang Gehner
• 12:42   15,000 tables Michael Riess
• 13:00   Re: slow insert into very large table Andreas Pflug
• 13:20   Re: 15,000 tables David Lang
• 14:13   filesystem performance with lots of files David Lang
• 14:15   Re: 15,000 tables Michael Riess
• 14:15   Re: 15,000 tables Michael Riess
• 14:29   Re: About the relation between fragmentation of file and David Lang
• 14:42   Re: 15,000 tables Jaime Casanova
• 14:49   Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0 Markus Wollny
• 14:50   Re: slow insert into very large table Tom Lane
• 15:03   Re: 15,000 tables Tom Lane
• 15:15   Re: 15,000 tables Jaime Casanova
• 15:15   Re: pg_dump slow Merlin Moncure
• 15:15   Re: 15,000 tables Michael Riess
• 15:26   Re: Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0 Tom Lane
• 15:30   Re: Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0 Markus Wollny
• 15:31   Re: 15,000 tables Guido Neitzer
• 15:34   Re: Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0 Tom Lane
• 15:45   Re: 15,000 tables Michael Riess
• 16:07   Re: 15,000 tables 
• 16:31   pg_stat* values ... Marc G. Fournier
• 17:03   Re: filesystem performance with lots of files Qingqing Zhou
• 17:04   Re: 15,000 tables Chris Browne
• 17:07   Re: 15,000 tables Gavin M. Roy
• 17:08   COPY into table too slow with index Rick Schumeyer
• 17:40   Re: 15,000 tables Tino Wildenhain
• 17:48   Re: 15,000 tables Ron
• 17:49   Re: 15,000 tables Gavin M. Roy
• 17:57   Re: 15,000 tables Tom Lane
• 18:04   Insert performance slows down in large batch Jeremy Haile
• 18:09   Re: 15,000 tables Gavin M. Roy
• 18:19   Re: Insert performance slows down in large batch Tom Lane
• 18:34   Re: 15,000 tables Michael Riess
• 18:41   Re: 15,000 tables Jaime Casanova
• 19:29   Re: 15,000 tables Merlin Moncure
• 20:16   Re: 15,000 tables Scott Marlowe
• 20:17   Re: 15,000 tables Alvaro Herrera
• 21:23   Re: COPY into table too slow with index: now an I/O question Rick Schumeyer