Re: 15,000 tables - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From
Subject Re: 15,000 tables
Date
Msg-id 06f401c5f699$bbae2af0$0201a8c0@iwing
Whole thread Raw
In response to 15,000 tables  (Michael Riess <mlriess@gmx.de>)
Responses Re: 15,000 tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-performance
hi michael

>> Have you ANALYZEd your database? VACUUMing?
>
> Of course ... before 8.1 we routinely did a vacuum full analyze each
> night. As of 8.1 we use autovacuum.


what i noticed is autovacuum not working properly as it should. i had 8.1
running with autovacuum for just 2 days or so and got warnings in pgadmin
that my tables would need an vacuum. i've posted this behaviour some weeks
ago to the novice list requesting more infos on how to "tweak" autovacuum
properly - unfortunately without any respones. thats when i switched the
nightly analyze job back on - everything runs smooth since then.

maybe it helps in your case as well?

cheers,
thomas





pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Michael Riess
Date:
Subject: Re: 15,000 tables
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: pg_stat* values ...