Re: 15,000 tables - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: 15,000 tables
Date
Msg-id c2d9e70e0512010742p5e5fb61dx84dfb8e332c05352@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to 15,000 tables  (Michael Riess <mlriess@gmx.de>)
Responses Re: 15,000 tables
List pgsql-performance
On 12/1/05, Michael Riess <mlriess@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are currently running a postgres server (upgraded to 8.1) which has
> one large database with approx. 15,000 tables. Unfortunately performance
> suffers from that, because the internal tables (especially that which
> holds the attribute info) get too large.
>
> (We NEED that many tables, please don't recommend to reduce them)
>

Have you ANALYZEd your database? VACUUMing?

BTW, are you using some kind of weird ERP? I have one that treat
informix as a fool and don't let me get all of informix potential...
maybe the same is in your case...

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: David Lang
Date:
Subject: Re: About the relation between fragmentation of file and
Next
From: "Markus Wollny"
Date:
Subject: Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0