Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Date
Msg-id 43963D9B.4020605@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene  (Michael Riess <mlriess@gmx.de>)
Responses Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
List pgsql-performance
...

So you'll avoid a non-core product and instead only use another non-core
product...?

Chris

Michael Riess wrote:
>
>> Has anyone ever compared TSearch2 to Lucene, as far as performance is
>> concerned?
>
>
> I'll stay away from TSearch2 until it is fully integrated in the
> postgres core (like "create index foo_text on foo (texta, textb) USING
> TSearch2"). Because a full integration is unlikely to happen in the near
> future (as far as I know), I'll stick to Lucene.
>
> Mike
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Michael Stone
Date:
Subject: Re: LVM and Postgres
Next
From: Mitchell Skinner
Date:
Subject: Re: Faster db architecture for a twisted table.