Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Michael Riess
Subject Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Date
Msg-id dn64it$17bk$1@news.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
List pgsql-performance
No, my problem is that using TSearch2 interferes with other core
components of postgres like (auto)vacuum or dump/restore.


> ...
>
> So you'll avoid a non-core product and instead only use another non-core
> product...?
>
> Chris
>
> Michael Riess wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone ever compared TSearch2 to Lucene, as far as performance is
>>> concerned?
>>
>>
>> I'll stay away from TSearch2 until it is fully integrated in the
>> postgres core (like "create index foo_text on foo (texta, textb) USING
>> TSearch2"). Because a full integration is unlikely to happen in the
>> near future (as far as I know), I'll stick to Lucene.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>>
>>               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Query Fails with error calloc - Cannot alocate memory
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene