Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

1 June 2004

• 21:04   Trigger & Function Duane Lee - EGOVX
• 22:04   Re: Trigger & Function Mike Nolan
• 22:55   PostgreSQL on VMWare vs Windows vs CoLinux Vitaly Belman

2 June 2004

• 00:08   Disk performance, was Re: tablespaces and DB administration Marty Scholes
• 03:24   PostgreSQL and Kernel 2.6.x V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems]
• 03:32   Re: PostgreSQL and Kernel 2.6.x Rod Taylor
• 14:28   Re: PostgreSQL on VMWare vs Windows vs CoLinux Greg Stark
• 15:38   Re: PostgreSQL and Kernel 2.6.x Rajesh Kumar Mallah
• 15:48   Re: PostgreSQL on VMWare vs Windows vs CoLinux Jan Wieck
• 15:52   Re: PostgreSQL on VMWare vs Windows vs CoLinux Tom Lane
• 17:14   Re: Trigger & Function Duane Lee - EGOVX
• 18:48   Re: PostgreSQL on VMWare vs Windows vs CoLinux Matthew Nuzum
• 19:14   Re: PostgreSQL on VMWare vs Windows vs CoLinux Leeuw van der, Tim
• 19:35   Context Switching issue: Spinlock doesn't fix. Josh Berkus
• 20:02   Postgres query optimization with varchar fields W.H. van Atteveldt
• 20:27   Re: PostgreSQL on VMWare vs Windows vs CoLinux Shachar Shemesh
• 20:28   Re: Hardware opinions wanted Andrew Hammond
• 20:45   Re: PostgreSQL on VMWare vs Windows vs CoLinux Merlin Moncure
• 21:13   Re: Pl/Pgsql Functions running simultaneously Marcus Whitney
• 21:31   Re: PostgreSQL on VMWare vs Windows vs CoLinux Gary Doades
• 21:32   Re: Inherited Tables Performance Marcus Whitney
• 21:39   Re: PostgreSQL on VMWare vs Windows vs CoLinux Greg Stark

3 June 2004

• 01:33   Re: Postgres query optimization with varchar fields Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:00   Re: PostgreSQL on VMWare vs Windows vs CoLinux Matthew Nuzum
• 02:13   Re: PostgreSQL on VMWare vs Windows vs CoLinux Tom Lane
• 03:51   Re: PostgreSQL on VMWare vs Windows vs CoLinux Tom Lane
• 13:07   Re: select max(id) from aTable is very slow Richard Huxton
• 21:42   Re: Pl/Pgsql Functions running simultaneously Marcus Whitney
• 23:09   Most transactions per second on largest box? 

4 June 2004

• 05:57   Re: Most transactions per second on largest box? Greg Stark
• 12:10   Planner problem Mikael Kjellström
• 14:41   Re: Planner problem Tom Lane
• 15:10   Re: filesystem option tuning CH
• 15:33   Re: filesystem option tuning Tom Lane
• 15:47   postgres performance: comparing 2 data centers Michael Nonemacher
• 16:02   Re: postgres performance: comparing 2 data centers Merlin Moncure
• 16:07   Re: postgres performance: comparing 2 data centers Tom Lane
• 21:39   Re: Pl/Pgsql Functions running simultaneously Robert Treat
• 22:07   Re: postgres performance: comparing 2 data centers Michael Nonemacher
• 22:29   Re: postgres performance: comparing 2 data centers Rod Taylor
• 23:12   Re: postgres performance: comparing 2 data centers Michael Nonemacher

5 June 2004

• 00:33   Re: postgres performance: comparing 2 data centers Greg Stark
• 04:17   Re: postgres performance: comparing 2 data centers Tom Lane
• 17:15   Unused table of view Laurent Martelli
• 17:40   Re: Unused table of view Tom Lane
• 19:01   Re: Unused table of view Laurent Martelli
• 20:12   Using a COPY...FROM through JDBC? Steve Wampler

6 June 2004

• 10:40   Re: Slow in morning hours Harald Fuchs
• 11:09   Query involving views Laurent Martelli
• 16:22   Re: Query involving views Tom Lane
• 21:12   Re: Query involving views Laurent Martelli
• 21:57   Re: postgres performance: comparing 2 data centers Rod Taylor
• 22:39   Re: [JDBC] Using a COPY...FROM through JDBC? Markus Schaber

7 June 2004

• 05:54   Re: General performance questions about postgres on Apple Gregory S. Williamson
• 07:39   Relation of cpu_*_costs? SZŰCS Gábor
• 07:49   Re: [JDBC] Using a COPY...FROM through JDBC? Markus Schaber
• 10:22   Re: [JDBC] Using a COPY...FROM through JDBC? Kris Jurka
• 11:35   Postgres function use makes machine crash. Stef
• 13:53   Re: Relation of cpu_*_costs? Tom Lane
• 15:12   Re: Postgres function use makes machine crash. Tom Lane
• 15:36   Re: Postgres function use makes machine crash. Stef
• 16:00   PREPAREing statements versus compiling PLPGSQL Mark Aufflick
• 16:36   pl/pgsql and Transaction Isolation Marcus Whitney
• 16:48   Re: Pl/Pgsql Functions running simultaneously Marcus Whitney
• 17:18   Re: Relation of cpu_*_costs? SZŰCS Gábor
• 17:30   is it possible to for the planner to optimize this form? Merlin Moncure
• 17:41   Re: [JDBC] Using a COPY...FROM through JDBC? Steve Wampler
• 17:59   Re: [JDBC] Using a COPY...FROM through JDBC? Steve Wampler
• 19:48   seq scan woes Dan Langille
• 20:18   Re: seq scan woes Dan Langille
• 20:41   Re: is it possible to for the planner to optimize this form? Josh Berkus
• 21:02   Re: seq scan woes Dan Langille
• 21:59   Re: [JDBC] Using a COPY...FROM through JDBC? Kris Jurka
• 22:21   Join slow on "large" tables Josué Maldonado
• 22:32   Re: Join slow on "large" tables Josh Berkus
• 22:47   Re: Join slow on "large" tables Scott Marlowe
• 22:49   Re: seq scan woes Dan Langille
• 22:55   Re: seq scan woes Dan Langille
• 23:14   Re: Join slow on "large" tables Josué Maldonado
• 23:21   Re: Join slow on "large" tables Josh Berkus
• 23:32   Re: Join slow on "large" tables Josué Maldonado
• 23:32   Re: is it possible to for the planner to optimize this Duane Lee - EGOVX

8 June 2004

• 04:29   Re: pl/pgsql and Transaction Isolation Tom Lane
• 05:19   Re: Join slow on "large" tables Tom Lane
• 07:28   Use of Functional Indexs and Planner estimates Russell Smith
• 08:57   Re: Use of Functional Indexs and Planner estimates Manfred Koizar
• 14:27   Re: pl/pgsql and Transaction Isolation Marcus Whitney
• 14:34   Re: Use of Functional Indexs and Planner estimates Tom Lane
• 14:58   Re: Join slow on "large" tables Josué Maldonado
• 15:37   Re: Use of Functional Indexs and Planner estimates Scott Marlowe
• 16:00   reindex and copy - deadlock? Litao Wu
• 16:12   Re: Join slow on "large" tables Scott Marlowe
• 16:47   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Tom Lane
• 17:25   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Litao Wu
• 17:52   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Tom Lane
• 18:44   RamDisk 

9 June 2004

• 16:09   Re: Use of Functional Indexs and Planner estimates Greg Stark
• 19:29   Re: seq scan woes Rod Taylor
• 19:31   Re: seq scan woes Rod Taylor
• 19:56   Index oddity ken
• 20:12   Re: Index oddity Rod Taylor
• 20:52   Re: Index oddity ken
• 20:56   Re: Index oddity Rod Taylor
• 21:04   Re: Index oddity ken
• 21:29   Re: Index oddity Rod Taylor
• 23:13   Re: Index oddity ken

10 June 2004

• 01:38   Re: Index oddity Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:18   Re: Index oddity Rod Taylor
• 03:11   Re: Index oddity Mark Kirkwood
• 03:37   Re: Index oddity Joshua D. Drake
• 05:02   Re: Index oddity Tom Lane
• 14:24   *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding IN(...)) Frank van Vugt
• 15:00   Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding Stephan Szabo
• 15:19   Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding IN(...)) Tom Lane
• 15:32   Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding IN(...)) Frank van Vugt
• 15:44   Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding Jean-Luc Lachance
• 15:59   Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding Tom Lane
• 16:02   Re: Database Server Tuning Anjan Dave
• 16:51   Re: Database Server Tuning Vivek Khera
• 16:55   Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding Jean-Luc Lachance
• 17:09   Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding Stephan Szabo
• 17:14   Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding Stephan Szabo

11 June 2004

• 11:17   ORDER BY user defined function performance issues Nick Trainor
• 13:41   Re: ORDER BY user defined function performance issues Paul Thomas
• 13:55   Problems with vacuum! Domenico Sgarbossa
• 14:40   Re: Problems with vacuum! Chris Hoover
• 14:54   Re: [BULK] Problems with vacuum! Domenico Sgarbossa
• 15:03   Re: [BULK] Problems with vacuum! Doug McNaught
• 15:11   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Litao Wu
• 16:05   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Tom Lane
• 18:01   Re: ORDER BY user defined function performance issues Tom Lane
• 18:40   in-transaction insert performance in 7.5devel Merlin Moncure
• 18:55   Re: in-transaction insert performance in 7.5devel Rod Taylor
• 19:04   Re: in-transaction insert performance in 7.5devel Merlin Moncure
• 19:27   Re: in-transaction insert performance in 7.5devel Rod Taylor
• 19:35   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Litao Wu
• 19:52   Re: in-transaction insert performance in 7.5devel Tom Lane
• 20:28   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Tom Lane
• 21:04   Re: in-transaction insert performance in 7.5devel Merlin Moncure
• 21:30   Re: in-transaction insert performance in 7.5devel Tom Lane

13 June 2004

• 03:22   Additional select fields in a GROUP BY Vitaly Belman
• 03:40   Re: Additional select fields in a GROUP BY Tom Lane
• 13:46   Re: Additional select fields in a GROUP BY Bruno Wolff III
• 17:35   Re: Additional select fields in a GROUP BY Vitaly Belman
• 17:59   Re: Additional select fields in a GROUP BY Tom Lane

14 June 2004

• 15:26   Re: [BULK] Problems with vacuum! Dawn Hollingsworth
• 22:31   50 000 000 Table entries and I have to do a keyword search HELP NEEDED borajetta
• 23:49   Re: Index oddity (still) ken

15 June 2004

• 00:11   Re: 50 000 000 Table entries and I have to do a keyword search HELP NEEDED Josh Berkus
• 03:41   Re: Failed System. Help. Marcus Whitney
• 03:47   Re: Failed System follow up Marcus Whitney
• 06:04   Interpreting OSDB Results Neeraj
• 06:49   why is a constraint not 'pushed down' into a subselect when this subselect is using a 'group by' ?? Frank van Vugt
• 12:44   Re: 50 000 000 Table entries and I have to do a keyword search HELP NEEDED Jeremy Dunn
• 13:23   Re: why is a constraint not 'pushed down' into a subselect when this subselect is using a 'group by' ?? Tom Lane
• 13:52   Re: Index oddity (still) Tom Lane
• 15:31   Re: why is a constraint not 'pushed down' into a subselect when this subselect is using a 'group by' ?? Frank van Vugt
• 18:17   Re: why is a constraint not 'pushed down' into a subselect when this subselect is using a 'group by' ?? Tom Lane

16 June 2004

• 08:42   Re: why is a constraint not 'pushed down' into a subselect when this subselect is using a 'group by' ?? Frank van Vugt
• 14:00   Visual Explain Jeff
• 19:15   Basic Postgresql Performance Question Bill
• 19:36   Re: Basic Postgresql Performance Question Stephen Frost
• 20:09   Re: Basic Postgresql Performance Question Kevin Barnard
• 20:18   Re: Basic Postgresql Performance Question Scott Marlowe
• 20:49   Re: Basic Postgresql Performance Question Stephen Frost

17 June 2004

• 00:33   Re: 50 000 000 Table entries and I have to do a keyword search HELP NEEDED Josh Berkus
• 11:10   Re: Visual Explain Adam Witney
• 12:52   Re: Visual Explain Paul Thomas
• 13:37   Re: Visual Explain Jeff
• 16:35   Re: in-transaction insert performance in 7.5devel Merlin Moncure
• 16:54   Re: Visual Explain Vitaly Belman
• 17:04   Re: Visual Explain Jeff
• 17:36   Re: Visual Explain Paul Thomas
• 18:14   Re: Visual Explain Vitaly Belman
• 20:21   Slow vacuum performance Patrick Hatcher

18 June 2004

• 04:31   Re: Slow vacuum performance Dennis Bjorklund
• 08:17   Re: Slow vacuum performance Andrew McMillan
• 08:37   Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding SZUCS Gábor
• 11:32   Major differences between oracle and postgres performance - what can I do ? Gary Cowell
• 12:07   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance Richard Huxton
• 12:10   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance - what can I do ? Paul Thomas
• 12:13   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance - what can I do ? Jeff
• 12:19   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance Shridhar Daithankar
• 13:23   memory allocation Michael Ryan S. Puncia
• 13:26   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance - what can I do ? Gary Cowell
• 13:39   Re: memory allocation Devrim GUNDUZ
• 13:52   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance pginfo
• 13:55   Re: [BULK] Problems with vacuum! Domenico Sgarbossa
• 13:56   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance Richard Huxton
• 13:58   Re: memory allocation Richard Huxton
• 14:29   Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding Tom Lane
• 14:58   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance - what can I do ? Tom Lane
• 15:12   Re: [BULK] Problems with vacuum! Tom Lane
• 15:15   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance pginfo
• 15:47   Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding Stephan Szabo
• 15:48   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance - what can I do ? Gary Cowell
• 16:30   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance - what can I do ? Stephen Frost
• 17:04   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance - what can I do ? Tom Lane
• 17:53   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance - what can I do ? Stephen Frost
• 18:06   Re: [BULK] Problems with vacuum! Scott Marlowe
• 18:16   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance - what can I do ? Stephen Frost
• 19:02   Re: [BULK] Problems with vacuum! Scott Marlowe
• 19:08   Re: [BULK] Problems with vacuum! Joshua D. Drake
• 20:57   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance - what can I do ? Tom Lane
• 23:06   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance - what can I do ? Gary Cowell

20 June 2004

• 16:40   Hi! Janio Rosa da Silva
• 18:16   Indexing question Stan Bielski
• 18:16   pg_fetch_array Thanks
• 18:16   Re: 50 000 000 Table entries and I have to do a keyword search HELP NEEDED Aaron
• 18:48   Re: Indexing question Tom Lane
• 20:02   Re: pg_fetch_array Rod Taylor

21 June 2004

• 10:12   Re: Slow vacuum performance Andrew McMillan
• 10:35   Re: pg_fetch_array Richard Huxton
• 15:35   Re: Slow vacuum performance Patrick Hatcher
• 17:58   Postgres over Linux NBD or NFS Andrew Hammond
• 19:42   Re: Pl/Pgsql Functions running simultaneously Andrew Hammond

22 June 2004

• 01:33   Re: Postgres over Linux NBD or NFS Tom Lane
• 02:44   Re: Postgres over Linux NBD or NFS Andrew Rawnsley
• 03:46   Re: Postgres over Linux NBD or NFS Scott Marlowe
• 12:12   Re: Postgres over Linux NBD or NFS Christopher Browne
• 12:47   Re: Postgres over Linux NBD or NFS Andrew Rawnsley
• 13:21   Re: Postgres over Linux NBD or NFS Matt Clark
• 13:34   Re: [BULK] Problems with vacuum! Domenico Sgarbossa
• 13:44   Re: Postgres over Linux NBD or NFS Andrew Hammond
• 14:28   postgresql and openmosix migration Bill
• 15:00   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Litao Wu
• 16:24   Re: Hi! Josh Berkus
• 16:27   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Tom Lane
• 16:34   Re: postgresql and openmosix migration Josh Berkus
• 17:30   Re: postgresql and openmosix migration Bill
• 17:47   Re: postgresql and openmosix migration Bruno Wolff III
• 17:58   Re: postgresql and openmosix migration 
• 18:16   Re: postgresql and openmosix migration Richard Welty
• 18:43   after using pg_resetxlog, db lost Shea,Dan [CIS]
• 18:50   Re: postgresql and openmosix migration Matthew Nuzum
• 19:36   Re: after using pg_resetxlog, db lost Tom Lane
• 20:05   Re: after using pg_resetxlog, db lost Richard Huxton
• 20:25   Re: after using pg_resetxlog, db lost Tom Lane

23 June 2004

• 01:25   Re: postgresql and openmosix migration Joe Conway
• 14:50   Re: postgresql and openmosix migration Andrew Hammond
• 16:04   Re: Traduc Party Laurent Martelli
• 16:36   Re: postgresql and openmosix migration Merlin Moncure
• 17:32   Re: postgresql and openmosix migration Josh Berkus
• 17:54   Re: postgresql and openmosix migration Rod Taylor
• 18:22   Re: postgresql and openmosix migration Richard Welty
• 18:47   Re: Traduc Party Laurent Martelli

24 June 2004

• 02:47   Re: after using pg_resetxlog, db lost Shea,Dan [CIS]
• 03:14   Re: Traduc Party Paul Thomas
• 03:41   Re: after using pg_resetxlog, db lost Tom Lane
• 12:25   Re: Pas la samedi Laurent Martelli
• 16:15   Re: after using pg_resetxlog, db lost Shea,Dan [CIS]
• 16:34   Re: after using pg_resetxlog, db lost Tom Lane
• 17:17   Re: after using pg_resetxlog, db lost Shea,Dan [CIS]

25 June 2004

• 07:00   postgres 7.4 at 100% Chris Cheston
• 09:10   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Richard Huxton
• 19:37   How can one see what queries are running withing a postgres instance? P.A.M. van Dam
• 20:51   Re: How can one see what queries are running withing a postgres instance? Hervé Piedvache

26 June 2004

• 07:27   Re: How can one see what queries are running withing a postgres instance? Hervé Piedvache
• 08:09   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Chris Cheston
• 08:58   Re: How can one see what queries are running withing a Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 13:32   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Doug McNaught
• 14:16   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Joshua D. Drake
• 14:46   Re: How can one see what queries are running withing a Tom Lane
• 23:03   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Chris Cheston

27 June 2004

• 05:33   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Christopher Kings-Lynne

28 June 2004

• 00:35   SQL stupid query plan... terrible performance ! Jim
• 02:47   Re: SQL stupid query plan... terrible performance ! Jeff
• 03:28   Query performance Bill
• 03:31   Re: SQL stupid query plan... terrible performance ! Tom Lane
• 04:47   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Frank Knobbe
• 05:20   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Tom Lane
• 05:22   Re: SQL stupid query plan... terrible performance ! Klint Gore
• 05:49   Re: SQL stupid query plan... terrible performance ! Tom Lane
• 09:14   Re: Query performance Richard Huxton
• 16:49   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Josh Berkus
• 17:03   Re: Query performance Bill
• 17:42   Re: SQL stupid query plan... terrible performance ! Jim
• 19:41   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Josh Berkus
• 21:48   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Frank Knobbe
• 22:48   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Josh Berkus

29 June 2004

• 06:41   no index-usage on aggregate-functions? Harald Lau (Sector-X)
• 07:24   Re: no index-usage on aggregate-functions? Scott Marlowe
• 07:28   Re: no index-usage on aggregate-functions? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:00   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Chris Cheston
• 08:14   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:37   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Chris Cheston
• 08:38   Re: Query performance Richard Huxton
• 08:45   Re: no index-usage on aggregate-functions? Harald Lau (Sector-X)
• 11:49   Re: no index-usage on aggregate-functions? Dennis Bjorklund
• 12:30   Slow INSERT Michal Táborský
• 13:22   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Bruno Wolff III
• 13:37   Re: no index-usage on aggregate-functions? Bruno Wolff III
• 13:52   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Tom Lane
• 14:33   Re: Slow INSERT Tom Lane
• 15:18   Re: Slow INSERT Michal Taborsky
• 15:44   Re: Major differences between oracle and postgres performance - what can I do ? Mischa Sandberg
• 15:44   Re: Postgres over Linux NBD or NFS Carlos Eduardo Smanioto
• 15:51   Re: Postgres over Linux NBD or NFS Matthew Nuzum
• 15:54   High load average with PostgreSQL 7.4.2 on debian/ibm eserver. eleven@ludojad.itpp.pl
• 16:00   Re: Slow INSERT Michal Taborsky
• 16:03   Re: Slow INSERT Tom Lane
• 16:08   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Gavin M. Roy
• 16:12   Re: Slow INSERT Tom Lane
• 16:19   Re: High load average with PostgreSQL 7.4.2 on debian/ibm eserver. Marc
• 16:59   Re: High load average with PostgreSQL 7.4.2 on debian/ibm Bill Montgomery
• 17:24   Re: no index-usage on aggregate-functions? Scott Marlowe
• 17:32   Re: VidéoProj -> RMLL Laurent Martelli
• 17:42   suggestions to improve performace Mohan A
• 17:53   Re: High load average with PostgreSQL 7.4.2 on debian/ibm eserver. eleven@ludojad.itpp.pl
• 18:22   Re: no index-usage on aggregate-functions? Harald Lau (Sector-X)
• 18:31   Re: Query performance Bill
• 19:57   Re: Query performance Richard Huxton
• 20:06   Range query optimization Mischa Sandberg
• 21:11   Re: Query performance Bruno Wolff III
• 22:38   Re: High load average with PostgreSQL 7.4.2 on Scott Marlowe
• 23:30   Re: suggestions to improve performace Josh Berkus
• 23:35   Re: High load average with PostgreSQL 7.4.2 on debian/ibm eserver. Josh Berkus

30 June 2004

• 07:19   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Chris Cheston
• 07:30   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:35   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Chris Cheston
• 10:02   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 13:47   Re: Query performance Bill
• 14:32   Re: Query performance Rod Taylor
• 15:19   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Litao Wu
• 15:46   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Tom Lane
• 17:05   Re: postgres 7.4 at 100% Duane Lee - EGOVX
• 17:18   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Litao Wu
• 17:46   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Tom Lane
• 18:45   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Litao Wu
• 19:33   Re: reindex and copy - deadlock? Tom Lane