On Jun 21, 2004, at 2:02 PM, Andrew Hammond wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> We're looking for an alternative to fiber-channel disk arrays for mass
> storage. One of the ideas that we're exploring would involve having the
> cluster on an NFS mounted filesystem. Another technology we're looking
> at is the Linux NBD (Network Block Device).
>
No idea about NBDs, but its generally accepted that running over NFS
would significantly
decrease reliability and performance, i.e. it would be a Bad Move (tm).
Not sure what you
think to gain. I sure wouldn't trust NFS with a production database.
What exactly are you trying to gain, avoid, or do?
> Has anyone had any experience with running postgres over either of
> these
> technologies? What issues do we need to know about / pay attention to?
>
> - --
> Andrew Hammond 416-673-4138 ahammond@ca.afilias.info
> Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
> CB83 2838 4B67 D40F D086 3568 81FC E7E5 27AF 4A9A
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFA1yK6gfzn5SevSpoRAtYAAKCrghfAKV5kVuiTd/2TOwEbr4Q7hACgr3rT
> mEvFi8AOHX9I43T45fH1e0U=
> =1Cs9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> <ahammond.vcf>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to
> majordomo@postgresql.org)
>
--------------------
Andrew Rawnsley
President
The Ravensfield Digital Resource Group, Ltd.
(740) 587-0114
www.ravensfield.com
