> If I take away the diagonalSize condition in my query I find that there
> are 225 rows that satisfy the other conditions. 155 of these have a
> diagonalSize value of exactly 50.000, while the remaining 70 rows all
> have values larger than 50. Thus there is a big discrete jump in the
> number of rows at a diagonalSize of 50. However, the statistics are off
> by two orders of magnitude in guessing how many rows there are going to
> be in this case and thus is not using my index. How can I fix that?
Maybe you should drop your random_page_cost to something less than 4,
eg. 3 or even 2...
Chris
