Mailing lists [pgsql-patches]

1 April 2003

• 21:42   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Joe Conway

2 April 2003

• 18:16   Win32 path patch Bruce Momjian

3 April 2003

• 03:34   system() patch for Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 04:14   Win32 defines Bruce Momjian
• 12:43   Re: system() patch for Win32 Tom Lane
• 12:47   Re: Win32 defines Tom Lane
• 13:06   Re: Win32 path patch Peter Eisentraut
• 13:06   Re: Win32 defines Peter Eisentraut

4 April 2003

• 00:10   pglog-rotator Andrew Sullivan
• 00:59   Re: pglog-rotator Alvaro Herrera
• 18:14   Re: Win32 path patch Bruce Momjian
• 18:39   Re: system() patch for Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 18:48   Re: Win32 defines Bruce Momjian

5 April 2003

• 03:29   Re: Win32 defines Neil Conway
• 15:39   Re: Win32 defines Bruce Momjian
• 15:51   Re: Win32 defines Alvaro Herrera
• 15:53   Re: Win32 defines Bruce Momjian
• 17:39   Re: Win32 defines Rod Taylor
• 21:58   Re: Win32 defines Peter Eisentraut

7 April 2003

• 01:12   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Joe Conway
• 02:45   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Tom Lane
• 15:12   pglog-rotator Andrew Sullivan

8 April 2003

• 11:18   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Peter Eisentraut
• 12:57   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Hannu Krosing
• 13:01   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Tom Lane
• 15:18   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Joe Conway
• 15:37   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Tom Lane
• 15:55   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Joe Conway
• 18:48   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Hannu Krosing

9 April 2003

• 01:30   Minor doc patch for charset Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 18:00   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Tom Lane
• 21:22   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Joe Conway
• 21:44   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Tom Lane
• 22:49   FK on update no action patch Stephan Szabo

11 April 2003

• 09:29   IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II) Michael Graff
• 13:14   Re: IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II) Tom Lane
• 16:07   Modern C++ Interface Peter Jones
• 16:37   Re: Modern C++ Interface Patrick Welche
• 17:40   Re: IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II) Peter Eisentraut

12 April 2003

• 09:20   Re: IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II) Michael Graff
• 22:34   patch for cursor based querys in JDBC Nic Ferrier

13 April 2003

• 03:13   Re: [JDBC] patch for cursor based querys in JDBC Barry Lind
• 09:32   Resend of encoding docs patch Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 10:36   Re: [JDBC] patch for cursor based querys in JDBC Nic Ferrier
• 18:33   Reserved Key Words, Using "path" as a table name tom@tom-martin.de (Tom)
• 18:33   Re: Modern C++ Interface Peter Jones
• 21:56   Re: Reserved Key Words, Using "path" as a table name Tom Lane
• 22:38   Re: IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II) Peter Eisentraut

14 April 2003

• 00:50   Re: Modern C++ Interface Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:51   Re: IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II) Tom Lane
• 21:50   refcursor handling patch Nic Ferrier

15 April 2003

• 12:27   Re: Minor doc patch for charset Peter Eisentraut
• 16:03   Re: [JDBC] the build Nic Ferrier
• 20:28   Re: IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II) Bruce Momjian

16 April 2003

• 03:04   Re: Win32 defines Bruce Momjian
• 03:58   Re: [JDBC] the build Barry Lind
• 05:03   Re: Win32 defines Tom Lane
• 11:42   Re: [JDBC] the build Nic Ferrier
• 13:52   Re: Win32 defines Bruce Momjian
• 14:26   Re: Win32 defines Tom Lane
• 14:45   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Sean Chittenden
• 14:53   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Tom Lane
• 15:17   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Sean Chittenden
• 15:27   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Tom Lane
• 16:46   Re: [JDBC] the build Peter Eisentraut
• 16:54   Re: Win32 defines Bruce Momjian
• 17:00   Re: Win32 defines Tom Lane
• 17:14   Re: [JDBC] the build Nic Ferrier

17 April 2003

• 01:51   Re: Win32 defines Bruce Momjian
• 02:04   Re: Win32 defines Tom Lane
• 02:14   Re: Win32 defines Bruce Momjian
• 02:21   Re: Win32 defines Bruce Momjian
• 11:44   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Peter Eisentraut
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Tom Lane
• 16:39   Re: Win32 defines Peter Eisentraut
• 16:39   Re: Win32 defines Peter Eisentraut
• 16:39   Re: [JDBC] the build Peter Eisentraut
• 17:43   Re: Win32 defines Bruce Momjian
• 17:44   Re: Win32 defines Bruce Momjian
• 17:51   Re: [JDBC] the build Nic Ferrier
• 18:48   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Sean Chittenden
• 18:52   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Tom Lane
• 20:09   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Sean Chittenden
• 20:25   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Rod Taylor
• 20:40   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Tom Lane
• 20:55   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Sean Chittenden
• 22:01   Nested transactions, 1st try Alvaro Herrera
• 23:20   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Peter Eisentraut

18 April 2003

• 00:04   Re: Win32 defines Bruce Momjian
• 02:17   Win32 patch for COPY Bruce Momjian
• 08:55   Re: Nested transactions, 1st try Manfred Koizar
• 08:58   Re: Win32 defines Peter Eisentraut
• 22:45   Re: Win32 patch for COPY Bruce Momjian

19 April 2003

• 18:08   Slightly improved SSL bits... Sean Chittenden
• 20:13   build patch Nic Ferrier

21 April 2003

• 13:35   Re: [HACKERS] rename/unlink handling for Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 20:17   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Sean Chittenden

22 April 2003

• 02:45   Re: Nested transactions, 1st try Alvaro Herrera
• 04:39   holdable cursor mop-up Neil Conway
• 14:37   log_min_duration_statement feature Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 14:52   Re: log_min_duration_statement feature Tom Lane
• 22:34   Re: IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II) Michael Graff

23 April 2003

• 00:46   Re: log_min_duration_statement feature Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:31   Re: log_min_duration_statement feature Bruce Momjian
• 02:38   log_min_duration_statement #2 Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:46   Re: log_min_duration_statement #2 Christopher Kings-Lynne

25 April 2003

• 00:20   Re: [HACKERS] close() vs. closesocket() Bruce Momjian

27 April 2003

• 23:51   1st nested trasanctions supporting patch Alvaro Herrera

28 April 2003

• 02:47   2nd nested trasanctions supporting patch Alvaro Herrera
• 12:30   Re: 2nd nested trasanctions supporting patch Jan Wieck
• 19:33   Re: 2nd nested trasanctions supporting patch Alvaro Herrera Munoz

30 April 2003

• 01:58   Re: log_min_duration_statement #2 Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:30   Re: log_min_duration_statement #2 Bruce Momjian
• 02:39   Re: log_min_duration_statement #2 Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 22:57   refcursor result set patch Nic Ferrier