Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0304171956550.1617-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane writes:

> I think Sean's idea is not to make it "just as easy as MySQL", it's to
> make it "the *same* as MySQL", for the benefit of those that refuse to
> learn differently.  Them as won't adjust to "\dt" in place of "show
> tables" aren't likely to adjust to "select * from tables" either.
> Not even (maybe especially not) if it's arguably a standard.

"Same as MySQL" is impossible.  We can pick here and there and add tons of
duplicate interfaces, play catch-up when they change them, but there's
always going to be a next feature that "would be *really* nice if
PostgreSQL could support it and it would surely draw *tons* of users to
PostgreSQL".  Freely written MySQL code is basically completely
incompatible with PostgreSQL, so someone who needs to switch will have to
relearn anyway.

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Nested transactions, 1st try
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 defines