Bruce Momjian writes:
> OK, I have modified the patch to match your suggestions. I also removed
> the N_PLAT_NLM define because I think that just got in when we were
> thinking about the Novell port that we cancelled. Is that correct?
Could you use HAVE_WORKING_LINK instead of HAVE_LINK? The symbol names
containing _WORKING_ are sort of standard for cases where the function
exists but doesn't really work well.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
