Re: 2nd nested trasanctions supporting patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Alvaro Herrera Munoz
Subject Re: 2nd nested trasanctions supporting patch
Date
Msg-id 20030428203333.GC10319@dcc.uchile.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2nd nested trasanctions supporting patch  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-patches
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 09:29:55AM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > It also adds some accesor functions so that other functions can read and
> > modify what they need.
>
> What's the performance impact caused by the accessor functions? I
> thought most of the tuple visibility code is done in macros for some
> reason.

Oh, I dunno.  But actually the only macro I removed was IsSnapshotDirty.
All the others accessor functions are there to provide access to
now-local, previously-global variables that were accessed directly.  I
think everything can be converted macros if there's need.  I'll try to
do some performance measurements.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"La verdad no siempre es bonita, pero el hambre de ella si"


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: 2nd nested trasanctions supporting patch
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: log_min_duration_statement #2