Mailing lists [pgsql-jdbc]

22 July 2003

• 01:16   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object Oliver Jowett
• 03:24   Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepared Statements] Oliver Jowett
• 03:36   Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepared Statements] Oliver Jowett
• 04:11   the IN clause saga Oliver Jowett
• 05:24   Re: Prepared Statements Fernando Nasser
• 05:25   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 05:26   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 05:27   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 05:28   Re: Prepared Statements Fernando Nasser
• 05:29   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 05:31   Re: Prepared Statements Fernando Nasser
• 05:32   Re: Prepared Statements Fernando Nasser
• 05:34   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 05:35   Re: Sql Types Supported Satyajit Das
• 05:37   Re: Prepared Statements Peter Kovacs
• 05:38   Re: Prepared Statements Peter Kovacs
• 05:39   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 05:42   Re: Fix for using JDK1.2 instead of JDK1.4 method in date/time/timestampToString Barry Lind
• 05:48   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 05:56   Please adjust the subject [Was: Prepared Statements] Fernando Nasser
• 05:56   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 05:58   Re: Prepared Statements Barry Lind
• 05:58   Re: Prepared Statements Csaba Nagy
• 06:04   Re: Prepared Statements Kris Jurka
• 06:07   Patch applied for SQL Injection vulnerability for setObject(int,Object,int) Barry Lind
• 06:38   Re: Patch applied for SQL Injection vulnerability for setObject(int,Object,int) Oliver Jowett
• 09:47   inet type handling Sylwester Rutkowski
• 10:48   Re: RFC: Removal of support for JDBC1 drivers. Dave Cramer
• 11:04   Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepared Paul Thomas
• 13:46   Re: Patch applied for SQL Injection vulnerability for setObject(int,Object,int) Oliver Jowett
• 13:49   Re: Patch applied for SQL Injection vulnerability for setObject(int,Object,int) Tom Lane
• 13:51   patch: make setObject(...) more consistent about the types it generates Oliver Jowett
• 13:57   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 14:01   Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepared Fernando Nasser
• 14:08   Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepared Felipe Schnack
• 14:08   Re: the IN clause saga Felipe Schnack
• 14:19   patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Oliver Jowett
• 14:24   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Felipe Schnack
• 14:26   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object Dmitry Tkach
• 14:26   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object Oliver Jowett
• 14:27   patch: support user implementations of Array in setArray() Oliver Jowett
• 14:30   Re: the IN clause saga Dmitry Tkach
• 14:31   Re: the IN clause saga Dmitry Tkach
• 14:33   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Oliver Jowett
• 14:39   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object Dmitry Tkach
• 14:40   Re: the IN clause saga Oliver Jowett
• 14:43   Re: the IN clause saga Dmitry Tkach
• 14:44   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 14:50   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 14:50   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Oliver Jowett
• 14:53   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 14:53   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Fernando Nasser
• 14:53   Re: the IN clause saga Oliver Jowett
• 14:55   Re: the IN clause saga Dmitry Tkach
• 14:56   Re: the IN clause saga Darin Ohashi
• 14:59   Re: the IN clause saga Tom Lane
• 15:03   Re: the IN clause saga Dmitry Tkach
• 15:04   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Fernando Nasser
• 15:04   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 15:10   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Felipe Schnack
• 15:12   Re: the IN clause saga Oliver Jowett
• 15:17   Re: the IN clause saga Felipe Schnack
• 15:20   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 15:22   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 16:10   Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepared Fernando Nasser
• 16:35   Re: Patch applied for SQL Injection vulnerability for setObject(int,Object,int) Barry Lind
• 16:35   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Barry Lind
• 16:46   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Felipe Schnack
• 17:04   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object David Wall
• 17:08   Re: jdbc batch performance problem pginfo
• 17:13   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object Fernando Nasser
• 17:16   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object David Wall
• 17:19   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object David Wall
• 17:19   Re: the IN clause saga Barry Lind
• 17:32   Re: the IN clause saga Darin Ohashi
• 17:34   Re: inet type handling scott.marlowe
• 17:41   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 17:42   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 17:44   JDBC install João Paulo Vasconcellos
• 18:02   Re: JDBC install Fernando Nasser
• 18:23   Fix for getXXX (numbers) Kim Ho
• 18:40   unsuscribe Christian W. Flotzinger
• 18:57   getUDTs Kim Ho
• 19:06   Re: Fix for getXXX (numbers) Kim Ho
• 19:19   getMetaData Kim Ho
• 19:20   Re: RFC: Removal of support for JDBC1 drivers. Andrew Sullivan
• 19:37   Re: RFC: Removal of support for JDBC1 drivers. Fernando Nasser
• 20:29   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Paul Thomas
• 21:04   store JDBC SQL in Properties Erik Price
• 21:14   ... Jason Bruce
• 21:51   Re: the IN clause saga Joe Conway