On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 08:53:36AM -0700, Barry Lind wrote:
> Oliver,
>
> Yes that will no longer work. But syntactically it shouldn't anyway.
> You are passing a set of strings and saying the type is NUMERIC. What
> will still work is passing a set of numeric values:
>
> stmt.setObject(1, "(1, 2, 3)", Types.NUMERIC);
I agree that it makes no sense syntantically, but it *is* a loophole we're
talking about here! Interpreting "(1,2,3)" as a NUMERIC type doesn't make
sense either.
Anyway, if the half-escaping doesn't break anything standard, fine. I'd just
rather not make the driver ugly for the sake of backwards compatibility with
a *subset* of the cases where setObject was used in a non-standard way :)
-O
