Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

20 August

• 00:20   Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning Robert Haas
• 02:53   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs Jelte Fennema-Nio
• 03:14   Re: Incremental View Maintenance, take 2 Kirill Reshke
• 03:46   Re: Thread-safe nl_langinfo() and localeconv() Thomas Munro
• 04:10   Re: Detailed release notes Bruce Momjian
• 05:55   Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw Bruce Momjian
• 06:18   Re: PG docs - Sequence CYCLE clause Bruce Momjian
• 07:40   Re: Speed up Hash Join by teaching ExprState about hashing David Rowley
• 07:51   Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails Tender Wang
• 07:56   Re: Logical Replication of sequences Peter Smith
• 08:25   Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails Alvaro Herrera
• 08:45   Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails Tender Wang
• 09:05   Re: PG docs - Sequence CYCLE clause Peter Smith
• 09:32   Re: Improve pg_re_throw: check if sigjmp_buf is valid and report error Xiaoran Wang
• 09:37   Re: documentation structure jian he
• 09:39   Re: Improve pg_re_throw: check if sigjmp_buf is valid and report error Xiaoran Wang
• 09:44   Re: Improve pg_re_throw: check if sigjmp_buf is valid and report error Tom Lane
• 09:56   Re: define PG_REPLSLOT_DIR Ashutosh Bapat
• 10:36   Re: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication Amit Kapila
• 11:19   Re: define PG_REPLSLOT_DIR Bertrand Drouvot
• 11:40   Re: define PG_REPLSLOT_DIR Ashutosh Bapat
• 11:52   ANALYZE ONLY Michael Harris
• 12:09   Re: Incremental View Maintenance, take 2 Kirill Reshke
• 12:37   Re: Improve pg_re_throw: check if sigjmp_buf is valid and report error Xiaoran Wang
• 12:59   Re: Remaining reference to _PG_fini() in ldap_password_func Heikki Linnakangas
• 13:03   Re: Doc limitation update proposal: include out-of-line OID usage per TOAST-ed columns John Naylor
• 13:06   Re: Incremental View Maintenance, take 2 Kirill Reshke
• 13:29   Re: Test 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl faild in installcheck due to missing injection_points Maxim Orlov
• 13:34   Re: Doc limitation update proposal: include out-of-line OID usage per TOAST-ed columns Jakub Wartak
• 13:42   Re: ANALYZE ONLY Jelte Fennema-Nio
• 14:03   Re: Provide a pg_truncate_freespacemap function Ronan Dunklau
• 14:07   Re: Partial aggregates pushdown Jelte Fennema-Nio
• 14:26   Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
• 14:42   Re: Adding clarification to description of IPC wait events XactGroupUpdate and ProcArrayGroupUpdate Amit Kapila
• 14:46   Some questions about PostgreSQL’s design. 陈宗志
• 14:59   Re: race condition in pg_class Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:09   Re: Some questions about PostgreSQL’s design. Thomas Munro
• 16:40   Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication Amit Kapila
• 17:25   Re: ANALYZE ONLY Ilia Evdokimov
• 17:40   Re: Test 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl faild in installcheck due to missing injection_points Maxim Orlov
• 17:49   Re: ANALYZE ONLY David Rowley
• 17:50   Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ) Ajay Pal
• 18:02   Re: The xversion-upgrade test fails to stop server Andrew Dunstan
• 18:06   Re: define PG_REPLSLOT_DIR Bertrand Drouvot
• 18:16   Re: define PG_REPLSLOT_DIR Bertrand Drouvot
• 18:19   Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication vignesh C
• 18:19   Re: CREATE SUBSCRIPTION - add missing test case vignesh C
• 18:30   Re: define PG_REPLSLOT_DIR Yugo Nagata
• 18:55   Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted Bertrand Drouvot
• 19:00   Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning Amit Langote
• 19:05   Re: Remaining reference to _PG_fini() in ldap_password_func Tom Lane
• 19:14   Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning Amit Langote
• 19:31   Re: why is pg_upgrade's regression run so slow? Andrew Dunstan
• 19:46   Re: Some questions about PostgreSQL’s design. Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:48   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs Jacob Champion
• 20:15   Re: define PG_REPLSLOT_DIR Alvaro Herrera
• 20:21   Re: Improve pg_re_throw: check if sigjmp_buf is valid and report error Xing Guo
• 20:26   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs Jelte Fennema-Nio
• 20:53   Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning Robert Haas
• 21:04   Re: Test 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl faild in installcheck due to missing injection_points Tom Lane
• 21:24   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs Heikki Linnakangas
• 21:45   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs Robert Haas
• 21:53   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs Jelte Fennema-Nio
• 22:02   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs Robert Haas
• 22:10   Re: Test 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl faild in installcheck due to missing injection_points Tom Lane
• 22:26   Re: define PG_REPLSLOT_DIR Bertrand Drouvot
• 22:26   Re: ANALYZE ONLY Melih Mutlu
• 22:28   Re: define PG_REPLSLOT_DIR Bertrand Drouvot
• 22:29   Re: ANALYZE ONLY Melih Mutlu
• 22:30   Re: Test 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl faild in installcheck due to missing injection_points Alvaro Herrera
• 22:42   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs David G. Johnston
• 22:44   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs Robert Haas
• 22:49   Re: [Bug Fix]standby may crash when switching-over in certain special cases Yugo Nagata
• 22:50   Re: Partial aggregates pushdown Bruce Momjian
• 22:55   Re: Some questions about PostgreSQL’s design. Bruce Momjian
• 22:55   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs Jelte Fennema-Nio
• 23:01   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs David G. Johnston
• 23:02   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs Jacob Champion
• 23:03   Re: Partial aggregates pushdown Jelte Fennema-Nio
• 23:17   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs Robert Haas
• 23:21   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs David G. Johnston
• 23:30   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs Jacob Champion
• 23:42   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs David G. Johnston
• 23:46   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs Jacob Champion
• 23:55   Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs David G. Johnston