Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw
Date
Msg-id ZsPbWlXLova1ApZQ@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw  (Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 03:25:48AM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 12:15 PM Fujii Masao
> <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> > On 2024/08/09 17:49, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > > I just thought consolidating the information to one place would make
> > > the documentation more readable.
> >
> > Yes, so I think that adding a note about the required remote server version
> > to the cross-version compatibility section would be more intuitive.
> > This section already discusses the necessary server versions and limitations.
> > Patch attached.
> 
> Thanks for the patch!
> 
> I noticed that we already have mentioned such a version limitation on
> the analyze_sampling option outside that section (see the description
> for that option in the “Cost Estimation Options” section).  So my
> concern is that it might be inconsistent to state only the INSERT
> limitation there.  Maybe I am too worried about that.

I think it is an improvement, so applied to master.  Thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Detailed release notes
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PG docs - Sequence CYCLE clause