Re: PG docs - Sequence CYCLE clause - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: PG docs - Sequence CYCLE clause
Date
Msg-id ZsPgx7ORCpZRdbLi@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG docs - Sequence CYCLE clause  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: PG docs - Sequence CYCLE clause
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 01:46:23PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 13.08.24 07:46, Peter Smith wrote:
> > While reviewing another thread I had cause to be looking more
> > carefully at the SEQUENCE documentation.
> > 
> > I found it curious that, unlike other clauses, the syntax of the CYCLE
> > clause was not displayed on a line by itself.
> > 
> > I have changed that, and at the same time I have moved the CYCLE
> > syntax (plus its description) to be adjacent to MINVALUE/MAXVALUE,
> > which IMO is where it naturally belongs.
> > 
> > Please see the attached patch.
> 
> I agree, it makes a bit more sense with your patches.

Great, patch applied to master.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Speed up Hash Join by teaching ExprState about hashing