Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Subject Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails
Date
Msg-id 20240820102651.273ecdf5@karst
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 18:50:10 -0400
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:

> On 2024-Jul-26, Tender Wang wrote:
>
> > Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> 于2024年7月26日周五 14:57写道:
> >
> > > There is a bug report[0] Tender comments might be the same issue as
> > > this one, but I tried Alvaro's and mine patch, neither could solve
> > > that problem, I did not tried Tender's earlier patch thought. I post
> > > the test script below in case you are interested.
> >
> > My earlier patch should handle Alexander reported case. But I did not
> > do more test. I'm not sure that wether or not has dismatching between
> > pg_constraint and pg_trigger.
> >
> > I aggred with Alvaro said that "requires a much more invasive
> > solution".
>
> Here's the patch which, as far as I can tell, fixes all the reported
> problems (other than the one in bug 18541, for which I proposed an
> unrelated fix in that thread[1]).  If you can double-check, I would very
> much appreciate that.  Also, I think the test cases the patch adds
> reflect the provided examples sufficiently, but if we're still failing
> to cover some, please let me know.

I'm back on this issue as well. I start poking at this patch to review it,
test it, challenge it and then report here.

I'll try to check if some other issues might have lost/forgot on they way as
well.

In the meantime, thank you Alvaro, Tender and Junwang for your work, time,
research and patches!



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jelte Fennema-Nio
Date:
Subject: Re: Partial aggregates pushdown
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding clarification to description of IPC wait events XactGroupUpdate and ProcArrayGroupUpdate