Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

21 January 2017

• 00:10   Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests Tom Lane
• 00:22   Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests Tom Lane
• 00:27   Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests Alvaro Herrera
• 01:15   Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests Tom Lane
• 01:26   Re: [HACKERS] delta relations in AFTER triggers Kevin Grittner
• 01:37   Re: [HACKERS] delta relations in AFTER triggers Kevin Grittner
• 01:45   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans Robert Haas
• 01:48   Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP Robert Haas
• 01:50   Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size Robert Haas
• 01:56   Re: [HACKERS] Possible issue with expanded object infrastructure onPostgres 9.6.1 Robert Haas
• 01:57   Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP Craig Ringer
• 01:58   Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP Robert Haas
• 02:04   Re: [HACKERS] PoC: Grouped base relation Robert Haas
• 02:08   Re: [HACKERS] delta relations in AFTER triggers Nico Williams
• 02:24   Re: [HACKERS] Microvacuum support for Hash Index Jesper Pedersen
• 02:47   Re: [HACKERS] Valgrind-detected bug in partitioning code Robert Haas
• 03:01   Re: [HACKERS] pg_hba_file_settings view patch Tom Lane
• 03:02   Re: [HACKERS] Valgrind-detected bug in partitioning code Tom Lane
• 03:12   Re: [HACKERS] Valgrind-detected bug in partitioning code Stephen Frost
• 03:25   Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Alvaro Herrera
• 03:28   Re: [HACKERS] Too many autovacuum workers spawned during forced auto-vacuum Robert Haas
• 03:29   Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take Robert Haas
• 03:30   Re: [HACKERS] Valgrind-detected bug in partitioning code Tom Lane
• 03:30   Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP Petr Jelinek
• 03:34   Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem Alvaro Herrera
• 03:37   Re: [HACKERS] delta relations in AFTER triggers Kevin Grittner
• 04:28   Re: [HACKERS] Valgrind-detected bug in partitioning code Robert Haas
• 04:41   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add GUCs for predicate lock promotion thresholds Kevin Grittner
• 05:25   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add GUCs for predicate lock promotion thresholds Kevin Grittner
• 05:38   Updating MATERIALIZED VIEWs (Re: [HACKERS] delta relations in AFTERtriggers) Nico Williams
• 06:00   Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size Michael Paquier
• 06:01   Re: [HACKERS] Valgrind-detected bug in partitioning code Tom Lane
• 06:34   [HACKERS] remote_apply for logical replication? Thomas Munro
• 07:20   Re: [HACKERS] Off-by-one oddity in minval for decreasing sequences Peter Eisentraut
• 07:49   Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag Thomas Munro
• 09:08   Re: [HACKERS] Off-by-one oddity in minval for decreasing sequences Michael Paquier
• 10:12   Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again Pavel Stehule
• 11:40   Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests Pavan Deolasee
• 12:53   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans Amit Kapila
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] patch: function xmltable Pavel Stehule
• 15:31   Re: [HACKERS] patch: function xmltable Pavel Stehule
• 16:39   [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Magnus Hagander
• 17:29   [HACKERS] pdf versus single-html Erik Rijkers
• 18:25   Re: [HACKERS] Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree Andrew Borodin
• 20:03   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost
• 20:05   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Michael Paquier
• 20:07   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Magnus Hagander
• 20:11   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost
• 20:15   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost
• 21:06   Re: [HACKERS] remote_apply for logical replication? Petr Jelinek
• 21:18   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Petr Jelinek
• 21:39   Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests Tom Lane
• 21:40   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost
• 21:41   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Fujii Masao
• 21:48   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost
• 22:02   Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests Pavan Deolasee
• 22:02   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Tom Lane
• 22:09   Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests Tom Lane
• 22:11   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost
• 22:12   Re: [HACKERS] pdf versus single-html Tom Lane
• 22:23   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Petr Jelinek
• 22:31   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost
• 22:35   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Tom Lane
• 22:38   Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests Pavan Deolasee
• 22:39   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Petr Jelinek
• 22:41   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Andreas Karlsson
• 22:41   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Tom Lane
• 22:51   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost
• 22:53   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost
• 22:54   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost
• 22:57   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Andres Freund
• 22:57   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Andres Freund
• 22:58   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Petr Jelinek
• 23:09   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Tom Lane
• 23:15   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost
• 23:16   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Andres Freund
• 23:22   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost
• 23:22   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost
• 23:23   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Tom Lane
• 23:39   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Petr Jelinek
• 23:46   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Stephen Frost
• 23:50   Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add function to import operating system collations Tom Lane
• 23:53   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Petr Jelinek
• 23:53   Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? Andres Freund