Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Date
Msg-id 30426.1485019434@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> What wouldn't hurt is enabling it by default in pg_regress on master for
> a while. That seems like a good thing to do independent of flipping the
> default.

Yeah, I could get behind that.  I'm not certain how much the regression
tests really stress checksumming: most of the tests work with small
amounts of data that probably never leave shared buffers.  But it'd be
some hard evidence at least.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?