Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwGcG7mUx=zWwT31kTsp8gUhvQ2d8SAReLgJpEs-T_9AZw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Petr Jelinek
<petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 21/01/17 11:39, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Is it time to enable checksums by default, and give initdb a switch to
>> turn it off instead?
>
> I'd like to see benchmark first, both in terms of CPU and in terms of
> produced WAL (=network traffic) given that it turns on logging of hint bits.

+1

If the performance overhead by the checksums is really negligible,
we may be able to get rid of wal_log_hints parameter, as well.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?