Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Borodin
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree
Date
Msg-id CAJEAwVH=NyO2q635XT1DsuCVEZ3DB705vc_56NqMfu8UA44bXQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hello Jeff!

>Review of the code itself:
How do you think, is there anything else to improve in that patch or
we can mark it as 'Ready for committer'?

I've checked the concurrency algorithm with original work of Lehman
and Yao on B-link-tree. For me everything looks fine (safe, deadlock
free and not increased probability of livelock due to
LockBufferForCleanup call).

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Erik Rijkers
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] pdf versus single-html
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?