Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Date
Msg-id d9fdeac7-13a0-a5e0-c3eb-757fc3318f7e@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Vladimir Borodin <root@simply.name>)
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 21/01/17 11:39, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Is it time to enable checksums by default, and give initdb a switch to
> turn it off instead?

I'd like to see benchmark first, both in terms of CPU and in terms of
produced WAL (=network traffic) given that it turns on logging of hint bits.

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] remote_apply for logical replication?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests