Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Too many autovacuum workers spawned during forced auto-vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Too many autovacuum workers spawned during forced auto-vacuum
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZXYwoMJ+7Fn8Yj_ZR1ui8ODoBdYiZ78WeLGC6o8odWNw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Too many autovacuum workers spawned during forced auto-vacuum  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:11 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>>> After sleeping on this, I'm inclined to go with Amit's fix for now.
>>> It seems less likely to break anything in the back-branches than any
>>> other option I can think up.
>>
>> Yeah, no objections here.
>
> +1.

OK, committed and back-patched all the way.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take