Re: [HACKERS] Too many autovacuum workers spawned during forced auto-vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Too many autovacuum workers spawned during forced auto-vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQP5X0E25zaHtYseyu6Jmq6AgbzK7EwL9eaovJwXq9r7A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Too many autovacuum workers spawned during forced auto-vacuum  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Too many autovacuum workers spawned during forced auto-vacuum  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:11 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> After sleeping on this, I'm inclined to go with Amit's fix for now.
>> It seems less likely to break anything in the back-branches than any
>> other option I can think up.
>
> Yeah, no objections here.

+1.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol