Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

28 June 2015

• 01:17   pg_trgm version 1.2 Jeff Janes
• 02:13   Re: pg_file_settings view vs. Windows Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:20   Re: pg_file_settings view vs. Windows Tom Lane
• 03:10   Refactoring pgbench.c Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:19   Re: pg_file_settings view vs. Windows Michael Paquier
• 04:41   Re: pg_file_settings view vs. Windows Tom Lane
• 05:14   Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior Tom Lane
• 06:16   Re: pg_file_settings view vs. Windows Sawada Masahiko
• 06:40   Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior Peter Geoghegan
• 06:45   Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers Amit Kapila
• 06:48   Re: pg_file_settings view vs. Windows Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:50   Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers Amit Kapila
• 06:55   Re: Semantics of pg_file_settings view Amit Kapila
• 07:00   proposal: condition blocks in psql Pavel Stehule
• 08:49   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Fabien COELHO
• 09:02   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Pavel Stehule
• 09:10   Re: Refactoring pgbench.c Fabien COELHO
• 09:47   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Corey Huinker
• 09:49   Re: Semantics of pg_file_settings view Sawada Masahiko
• 10:00   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Fabien COELHO
• 10:04   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Fabien COELHO
• 10:43   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Pavel Stehule
• 10:51   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Pavel Stehule
• 11:47   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Fabien COELHO
• 11:53   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Sawada Masahiko
• 12:43   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Pavel Stehule
• 13:30   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Michael Paquier
• 14:37   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Sawada Masahiko
• 15:11   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Michael Paquier
• 15:12   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Tomas Vondra
• 15:22   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Pavel Stehule
• 15:32   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Tomas Vondra
• 15:36   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Tomas Vondra
• 15:40   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Tomas Vondra
• 15:44   Re: Refactoring pgbench.c Tomas Vondra
• 15:50   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Pavel Stehule
• 16:11   Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers Robert Haas
• 16:21   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql David G. Johnston
• 16:58   Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers Andrew Dunstan
• 17:01   Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers Andres Freund
• 17:22   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Tomas Vondra
• 18:01   Re: Semantics of pg_file_settings view Tom Lane
• 18:20   Re: pg_file_settings view vs. Windows Tom Lane
• 18:31   Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior Tom Lane
• 18:35   Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers Tom Lane
• 18:45   Re: Semantics of pg_file_settings view Sawada Masahiko
• 18:46   Re: Semantics of pg_file_settings view Tom Lane
• 18:56   Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers Simon Riggs
• 19:17   Re: drop/truncate table sucks for large values of shared buffers Tom Lane
• 19:56   Re: Refactoring pgbench.c Tatsuo Ishii
• 21:18   Re: Refactoring pgbench.c Tomas Vondra
• 21:37   Re: Refactoring pgbench.c Fabien COELHO
• 21:46   Re: pg_rewind failure by file deletion in source server Heikki Linnakangas
• 22:20   Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Josh Berkus
• 22:29   Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior Peter Geoghegan
• 22:33   Re: PANIC in GIN code Heikki Linnakangas
• 22:55   Re: pg_rewind failure by file deletion in source server Heikki Linnakangas
• 22:58   Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior Josh Berkus
• 23:43   Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql Corey Huinker