Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior
Date
Msg-id 559051CE.5010009@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: Solaris testers wanted for strxfrm() behavior  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 06/28/2015 12:29 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> It might have been the right decision at the time to paper over the
> problem, but only for a year or two. I'd only favor adding defenses if
> it could be expected to take longer for the Solaris stdlib people to
> ship a fix for their egregious bug than it would take for the next
> Postgres point release. Why should that be true, though?

BTW, I've asked Joyent to test on their platform.

My perspective is that if both SmartOS and OmniOS pass, it's not our
responsibility to support OldSolaris if they won't update libraries.

However, OpenSCG and EDB support more OldSolaris customers than anyone,
AFAIK, so I'd like to her some opinions from them ...

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_rewind failure by file deletion in source server
Next
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: condition blocks in psql