Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

10 June 2014

• 00:29   Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins Jeff Janes
• 01:57   Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins Tom Lane
• 03:35   Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Naoya Anzai
• 04:04   Re: updated emacs configuration Peter Eisentraut
• 04:12   Re: tests for client programs Peter Eisentraut
• 04:19   Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Tom Dunstan
• 04:54   Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins Jeff Janes
• 05:06   Re: tests for client programs Noah Misch
• 05:19   Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins Tom Lane
• 07:27   Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink Amit Kapila
• 08:13   Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller b8flowerfire
• 11:03   Re: pg_receivexlog add synchronous mode 
• 11:20   Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Hannu Krosing
• 12:03   Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Tom Dunstan
• 12:06   Re: pg_xlogdump --stats 
• 12:53   Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink MauMau
• 13:18   Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension Hannu Krosing
• 14:56   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Gurjeet Singh
• 15:17   Re: Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Robert Haas
• 16:29   Re: updated emacs configuration Noah Misch
• 16:53   Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Robert Haas
• 17:00   Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink Robert Haas
• 17:02   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane
• 17:02   Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Robert Haas
• 17:18   Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Tom Lane
• 17:19   Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Kevin Grittner
• 17:21   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Robert Haas
• 17:23   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Gurjeet Singh
• 17:27   Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Tom Lane
• 17:30   Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Robert Haas
• 17:32   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund
• 17:36   Re: updated emacs configuration Tom Lane
• 17:37   Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Robert Haas
• 17:42   Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Tom Lane
• 17:43   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Robert Haas
• 17:45   Re: "cancelling statement due to user request error" occurs but the transaction has committed. Robert Haas
• 17:46   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Gurjeet Singh
• 17:46   Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Tom Lane
• 17:47   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund
• 17:49   Re: Compression of full-page-writes Rahila Syed
• 17:51   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: NUMA packaging and patch Robert Haas
• 17:57   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Robert Haas
• 17:58   Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Robert Haas
• 18:05   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane
• 18:14   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane
• 18:16   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund
• 18:20   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane
• 18:24   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund
• 18:30   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane
• 18:33   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels andres@anarazel.de (Andres Freund)
• 18:35   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Robert Haas
• 18:39   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Robert Haas
• 18:40   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane
• 18:45   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund
• 18:46   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Gurjeet Singh
• 18:46   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane
• 18:48   Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction Robert Haas
• 18:49   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund
• 18:51   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Robert Haas
• 18:52   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane
• 18:55   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Gurjeet Singh
• 18:56   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane
• 18:57   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Andres Freund
• 18:58   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Gurjeet Singh
• 18:58   Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Stephen Frost
• 19:02   Re: Proposing pg_hibernate Robert Haas
• 19:06   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane
• 19:09   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Robert Haas
• 19:30   branch for 9.5? Robert Haas
• 19:46   Re: branch for 9.5? Tom Lane
• 19:57   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels David G Johnston
• 20:05   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Joshua D. Drake
• 20:08   Re: NUMA packaging and patch Josh Berkus
• 20:13   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels David G Johnston
• 20:20   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Magnus Hagander
• 20:23   Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Gurjeet Singh
• 20:34   Re: NUMA packaging and patch Kevin Grittner
• 20:41   Getting “make: Entering an iso-8859-1 directory” error while building postgresql on MIPS platform shreesha21
• 20:44   Re: Re: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller Jeff Janes
• 20:46   Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Adam Brightwell
• 21:00   Re: Getting “make: Entering an iso-8859-1 directory” error while building postgresql on MIPS platform Tom Lane
• 21:02   make check For Extensions David E. Wheeler
• 21:05   Re: Why is it "JSQuery"? David E. Wheeler
• 21:07   Re: Getting “make: Entering an iso-8859-1 directory” error while building postgresql on MIPS platform shreesha21
• 21:11   Re: Re: Getting “make: Entering an iso-8859-1 directory” error while building postgresql on MIPS platform Tom Lane
• 21:19   Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Tom Lane
• 21:21   Re: Getting “make: Entering an iso-8859-1 directory” error while building postgresql on MIPS platform shreesha21
• 21:58   Re: Re: Getting “make: Entering an iso-8859-1 directory” error while building postgresql on MIPS platform Tom Lane
• 22:07   Re: Why is it "JSQuery"? Oleg Bartunov
• 22:31   Re: Why is it "JSQuery"? Oleg Bartunov
• 23:28   Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner? Brightwell, Adam