Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

29 January 2018

• 03:09   Failed test 'pg_recvlogical acknowledged changes, nothing pending on slot' Thomas Munro
• 03:35   Failed test 'psql query died successfully after SIGQUIT' Thomas Munro
• 03:57   Re: Transform for pl/perl Thomas Munro
• 04:01   Re: Built-in connection pooling Ivan Novick
• 04:02   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Pierre Ducroquet
• 04:07   Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots Thomas Munro
• 04:09   Re: Write lifetime hints for NVMe Dmitry Dolgov
• 04:31   Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach Peter Geoghegan
• 05:00   Re: Built-in connection pooling Bruce Momjian
• 05:02   Re: Documentation of pgcrypto AES key sizes Thomas Munro
• 05:02   Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts Rady, Doug
• 05:11   Re: Built-in connection pooling Ivan Novick
• 05:35   Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit Bruce Momjian
• 06:16   Re: Built-in connection pooling Bruce Momjian
• 06:50   Re: list partition constraint shape Amit Langote
• 07:08   Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: pg_(total_)relation_size andpartitioned tables Amit Langote
• 07:43   Re: Redefining inet_net_ntop Craig Ringer
• 08:25   Re: Invalid result from hash_page_items function Masahiko Sawada
• 08:45   Re: Boolean partitions syntax Amit Langote
• 09:03   Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: pg_(total_)relation_size andpartitioned tables Michael Paquier
• 09:06   Re: Updating timezone data to 2018c Michael Paquier
• 09:13   Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions Amit Kapila
• 10:07   Re: Redefining inet_net_ntop Tom Lane
• 10:21   Re: Boolean partitions syntax Amit Langote
• 10:29   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Separate log file for extension Jing Wang
• 10:31   Re: Redefining inet_net_ntop Craig Ringer
• 10:34   Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations Thomas Munro
• 10:35   Re: Failed test 'psql query died successfully after SIGQUIT' Tom Lane
• 10:43   Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support Michael Paquier
• 10:46   Linking PostgreSQL as a C++ program Craig Ringer
• 10:48   Re: Failed test 'psql query died successfully after SIGQUIT' Thomas Munro
• 10:59   Re: Failed test 'psql query died successfully after SIGQUIT' Thomas Munro
• 11:02   Re: Linking PostgreSQL as a C++ program Michael Paquier
• 11:03   Re: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound Masahiko Sawada
• 11:03   Re: Linking PostgreSQL as a C++ program Craig Ringer
• 11:12   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Overestimated filter cost and its mitigation Yuto Hayamizu
• 11:12   Re: CREATE ROUTINE MAPPING Ashutosh Bapat
• 11:40   Re: [HACKERS] PoC: full merge join on comparison clause Ashutosh Bapat
• 11:57   Re: Boolean partitions syntax Tom Lane
• 12:15   Re: list partition constraint shape Etsuro Fujita
• 12:19   Re: Reorder C includes in partition.c Etsuro Fujita
• 12:22   Re: list partition constraint shape Amit Langote
• 12:33   RE: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 12:59   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Pierre Ducroquet
• 13:12   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently Masahiko Sawada
• 13:15   Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Nikhil Sontakke
• 13:25   Re: Query related to alter table ... attach partition Ashutosh Bapat
• 13:28   Re: unique indexes on partitioned tables Amit Langote
• 13:45   A Generic Question about Generic type subscripting Hannu Krosing
• 14:06   Re: Enhance pg_stat_wal_receiver view to display connected host Michael Paquier
• 14:18   Re: Regarding ambulkdelete, amvacuumcleanup index methods Masahiko Sawada
• 14:29   Re: unique indexes on partitioned tables Amit Langote
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Aggregation push-down Antonin Houska
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping Jeevan Chalke
• 14:50   Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions(PostgreSQL 11) Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 14:57   Re: Built-in connection pooling Konstantin Knizhnik
• 14:58   Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts Fabien COELHO
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions(PostgreSQL 11) Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 15:36   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Andres Freund
• 15:43   Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench Ildar Musin
• 15:46   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Andres Freund
• 15:53   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.1 Andres Freund
• 15:55   Re: STATISTICS retained in CREATE TABLE ... LIKE (INCLUDING ALL)? David Rowley
• 16:12   Re: STATISTICS retained in CREATE TABLE ... LIKE (INCLUDING ALL)? David Rowley
• 16:20   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Pierre Ducroquet
• 16:23   Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Simon Riggs
• 16:26   Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 16:28   Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups Masahiko Sawada
• 16:38   Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Simon Riggs
• 16:40   Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 17:25   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views Yugo Nagata
• 17:44   Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods Ildus Kurbangaliev
• 18:03   Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench Fabien COELHO
• 18:45   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Konstantin Knizhnik
• 18:47   Re: A Generic Question about Generic type subscripting Arthur Zakirov
• 18:54   Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups Michael Paquier
• 18:55   Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench Ildar Musin
• 19:13   Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning Jesper Pedersen
• 19:24   Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations Konstantin Knizhnik
• 19:34   Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Tomas Vondra
• 19:41   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting Arthur Zakirov
• 19:49   Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Simon Riggs
• 20:01   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Aggregation push-down Chapman Flack
• 20:11   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs
• 20:13   Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Tomas Vondra
• 20:13   Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups David Steele
• 20:17   Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Simon Riggs
• 20:19   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Pavel Stehule
• 20:29   Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods Ildar Musin
• 20:31   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently Claudio Freire
• 20:40   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs
• 20:43   Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Aggregation push-down Robert Haas
• 20:51   Re: Cancelling parallel query leads to segfault Robert Haas
• 20:51   Re: \describe* Ryan Murphy
• 20:55   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Pavel Stehule
• 20:55   Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach Robert Haas
• 20:56   Re: \describe* David Fetter
• 21:07   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Robert Haas
• 21:12   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs
• 21:34   Re: Built-in connection pooling Bruce Momjian
• 21:42   Re: A Generic Question about Generic type subscripting Tom Lane
• 21:44   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Bruce Momjian
• 22:02   Re: Built-in connection pooling Vladimir Sitnikov
• 22:04   Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods Ildus Kurbangaliev
• 22:06   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Tom Lane
• 22:06   Re: Built-in connection pooling Bruce Momjian
• 22:13   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs
• 22:23   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Chapman Flack
• 22:34   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs
• 22:44   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Bruce Momjian
• 22:46   Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations Konstantin Knizhnik
• 22:50   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Tom Lane
• 22:51   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs
• 22:55   Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions Oliver Ford
• 23:00   Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 Andres Freund
• 23:03   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs
• 23:04   Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions Tomas Vondra
• 23:08   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Simon Riggs
• 23:18   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Pavel Stehule
• 23:23   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Peter Geoghegan
• 23:35   Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 Peter Geoghegan