Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jKoE=AXPz+gMdxXgod7UO_C8OGwJ6aD+A4b5nfxLOzQrA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
List pgsql-hackers
On 29 January 2018 at 14:55, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:

> My note was not against MERGE or INSERT ON CONFLICT. If I understand to this
> topic, I agree so these commands should be implemented separately. But if we
> use two commands with some intersection, there can be nice to have
> documentation about recommended use cases. Probably it will be very often
> question.

That is more qualitative assessment of each, which I think I will defer on.

This patch is about implementing the SQL Standard compliant MERGE
command which is widely used in other databases and by various tools.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11