Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Adam Brightwell
Subject Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups
Date
Msg-id CAE_9P=hGeCo9P4vpnfifnYWkBFKPbwvg-zbkxN3jgNpyFGaimg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Responses Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:17 PM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> On 1/29/18 9:13 AM, David Steele wrote:
>> On 1/29/18 5:28 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> But I
>>> have a question; can we exclude temp tables as well? The pg_basebackup
>>> includes even temp tables. But I don't think that it's necessary for
>>> backups
>> Thank you for having another look at the patch.
>>
>> Temp tables should be excluded by this code which is already in
>> basebackup.c:
>>
>> /* Skip temporary files */
>> if (strncmp(de->d_name,
>>             PG_TEMP_FILE_PREFIX,
>>             strlen(PG_TEMP_FILE_PREFIX)) == 0)
>>     continue;
>>
>> This looks right to me.
>
>
> Whoops, my bad.  Temp relations are stored in the db directories with a
> "t" prefix.  Looks like we can take care of those easily enough but I
> think it should be a separate patch.
>
> I'll plan to submit that for CF 2018-03.

I agree, I believe this should be a separate patch.

As for the latest patch above, I have reviewed, applied and tested it.

It looks good to me. As well, it applies cleanly against master at
(97d4445a03). All tests passed when running 'check-world'.

If it is agreed that the temp file exclusion should be submitted as a
separate patch, then I will mark 'ready for committer'.

-Adam


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] datetime.h defines like PM conflict with externallibraries