Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Date
Msg-id 495e24a5-d5bf-3ef2-ccdd-dd112c1c3a15@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/29/2018 11:13 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 29 January 2018 at 15:44, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> Uh, if we know we are going to get question on this, the patch had
>> better have an explanation of when to use it.  Pushing the problem to
>> later doesn't seem helpful.
> 
> What problem are you referring to?
> 
> INSERT ON CONFLICT UPDATE does ...
> 
> MERGE allows you to ...
In my reading of Pavel and Bruce, the only 'problem' being suggested
is that the patch hasn't added a bit of documentation somewhere that
lays out the relationship between these two things, more or less as
you just did.

-Chap


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11