Re: Redefining inet_net_ntop - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: Redefining inet_net_ntop
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YFe82oOac=WMqxjhBsn7kEc8VC6t_f6A4Pjz7yzhzujbQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Redefining inet_net_ntop  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 29 January 2018 at 17:07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

Another choice would be to stick a pg_ prefix on the function name.

That, plus a comment, seems just fine to me.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jing Wang
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Separate log file for extension
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations