Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

2 December 2019

• 12:04   Re: Considerable performance downgrade of v11 and 12 on Windows Laurenz Albe
• 15:43   [External] Join queries slow with predicate, limit, and ordering Aufar Gilbran
• 20:03   Make recently inserted/updated records available in the buffer/cache Sachin Divekar
• 20:13   Re: Make recently inserted/updated records available in the buffer/cache Hüseyin Demir
• 20:17   Re: Make recently inserted/updated records available in thebuffer/cache MichaelDBA
• 22:03   Re: Considerable performance downgrade of v11 and 12 on Windows Eugene Podshivalov

3 December 2019

• 03:38   Re: [External] Join queries slow with predicate, limit, and ordering Jeff Janes
• 10:50   Re: [External] Join queries slow with predicate, limit, and ordering Aufar Gilbran
• 20:29   Re: Make recently inserted/updated records available in the buffer/cache Michael Lewis
• 20:32   Re: Make recently inserted/updated records available in thebuffer/cache MichaelDBA
• 21:45   Re: Make recently inserted/updated records available in the buffer/cache Sachin Divekar
• 21:58   Re: Make recently inserted/updated records available in the buffer/cache Michael Lewis

4 December 2019

• 00:13   Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12 Andres Freund

5 December 2019

• 15:10   How to run in parallel in Postgres Lars Aksel Opsahl
• 19:42   Re: How to run in parallel in Postgres Laurenz Albe
• 20:46   autovacuum locking question Mike Schanne
• 20:47   Postgres backup tool recommendations for multi-terabyte database inGoogle Cloud Craig Jackson
• 22:51   Re: Postgres backup tool recommendations for multi-terabyte databasein Google Cloud Craig James

6 December 2019

• 00:05   Re: Postgres backup tool recommendations for multi-terabyte databasein Google Cloud Craig Jackson
• 00:08   Re: Postgres backup tool recommendations for multi-terabyte databasein Google Cloud Nikolay Samokhvalov
• 01:49   Re: autovacuum locking question Michael Lewis
• 02:18   RE: autovacuum locking question Mike Schanne
• 02:49   Re: autovacuum locking question Tom Lane
• 02:55   Re: autovacuum locking question Jeff Janes
• 11:39   Re: How to run in parallel in Postgres Lars Aksel Opsahl
• 18:46   RE: autovacuum locking question Mike Schanne
• 18:55   RE: autovacuum locking question Mike Schanne
• 20:12   Re: autovacuum locking question Tom Lane
• 20:18   unexpected result for wastedbytes query after vacuum full Mike Schanne
• 20:19   Re: autovacuum locking question Tom Lane
• 20:47   Re: autovacuum locking question Jeff Janes
• 20:49   Re: autovacuum locking question Justin Pryzby
• 20:50   Re: autovacuum locking question MichaelDBA
• 21:42   Legal disclaimers on emails to this group Craig James
• 22:27   Re: Legal disclaimers on emails to this group Tom Lane

7 December 2019

• 00:55   threads (Re: Legal disclaimers on emails to this group) Justin Pryzby
• 01:42   Re: Legal disclaimers on emails to this group Tim Cross
• 02:28   Re: unexpected result for wastedbytes query after vacuum full Justin Pryzby
• 03:59   Re: autovacuum locking question Jeff Janes
• 04:23   Re: How to run in parallel in Postgres Ondrej Ivanič
• 04:25   Re: How to run in parallel in Postgres Justin Pryzby
• 14:17   Re: How to run in parallel in Postgres Lars Aksel Opsahl
• 14:27   Re: How to run in parallel in Postgres Lars Aksel Opsahl
• 15:10   Re: Legal disclaimers on emails to this group Jean-David Beyer
• 23:05   Specific query taking time to process Fahiz Mohamed

8 December 2019

• 16:08   query that canceled isnt logged Mariel Cherkassky
• 18:05   Re: query that canceled isnt logged Tom Lane
• 18:18   Re: query that canceled isnt logged Mariel Cherkassky
• 18:23   Re: query that canceled isnt logged Mariel Cherkassky
• 18:42   Re: query that canceled isnt logged Tom Lane
• 21:14   Re: How to run in parallel in Postgres, EXECUTE_PARALLEL  Lars Aksel Opsahl
• 23:04   Re: How to run in parallel in Postgres, EXECUTE_PARALLEL Joe Conway

9 December 2019

• 00:59   Re: How to run in parallel in Postgres, EXECUTE_PARALLEL Lars Aksel Opsahl
• 07:13   Re: Specific query taking time to process Justin Pryzby
• 22:03   Re: Specific query taking time to process Michael Lewis

10 December 2019

• 01:31   Re: Logical replication performance Jeff Janes
• 01:39   Re: Specific query taking time to process Fahiz Mohamed
• 02:05   RE: Legal disclaimers on emails to this group Mike Schanne
• 02:06   RE: unexpected result for wastedbytes query after vacuum full Mike Schanne
• 19:43   Re: unexpected result for wastedbytes query after vacuum full Guillaume Lelarge
• 22:48   Re: unexpected result for wastedbytes query after vacuum full Jeff Janes
• 23:15   Re: Specific query taking time to process Michael Lewis
• 23:42   Re: Specific query taking time to process Justin Pryzby

11 December 2019

• 18:23   Re: unexpected result for wastedbytes query after vacuum full Guillaume Lelarge
• 22:53   Re: Specific query taking time to process Fahiz Mohamed
• 23:09   Re: Specific query taking time to process Michael Lewis

12 December 2019

• 00:14   Re: Specific query taking time to process Jeff Janes
• 05:25   Re: Specific query taking time to process Jeff Janes
• 17:49   Re: Legal disclaimers on emails to this group Moreno Andreo
• 18:03   Re: Legal disclaimers on emails to this group Moreno Andreo

16 December 2019

• 08:59   Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Shijia Wei
• 11:03   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Olivier Gautherot
• 12:51   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Shijia Wei
• 13:17   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Olivier Gautherot
• 14:48   Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12 Mariel Cherkassky
• 15:27   RE: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12 Andrew Zakharov
• 16:01   Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12 Mariel Cherkassky
• 16:25   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Laurenz Albe
• 16:50   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Tom Lane
• 20:28   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Shijia Wei
• 20:29   Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12 Pavel Stehule
• 23:39   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Peter Geoghegan
• 23:50   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Tom Lane

17 December 2019

• 01:08   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Nicolas Charles
• 01:48   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Tom Lane
• 03:53   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Sam Gendler
• 05:58   weird long time query Kaijiang Chen
• 07:04   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Andres Freund
• 14:08   Re: weird long time query Pavel Stehule
• 16:08   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Laurenz Albe
• 19:11   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Jeff Janes
• 20:04   Re: weird long time query Tom Lane
• 23:03   shared memory size during upgrade pgsql with partitions Piotr Włodarczyk

18 December 2019

• 06:23   Re: weird long time query Kaijiang Chen
• 07:01   Re: shared memory size during upgrade pgsql with partitions(max_locks_per_transaction) Justin Pryzby
• 12:16   Re: shared memory size during upgrade pgsql with partitions(max_locks_per_transaction) Piotr Włodarczyk
• 12:53   How to prevent POSTGRES killing linux system from accepting too much inserts? James(王旭)
• 12:53   How to prevent POSTGRES killing linux system from accepting too much inserts? James(王旭)
• 15:17   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Laurenz Albe
• 16:44   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Tom Lane
• 21:34   Re: How to prevent POSTGRES killing linux system from accepting toomuch inserts? Merlin Moncure
• 21:34   Re: How to prevent POSTGRES killing linux system from accepting toomuch inserts? Merlin Moncure
• 22:09   Re: How to prevent POSTGRES killing linux system from accepting toomuch inserts? Jeff Janes
• 22:09   Re: How to prevent POSTGRES killing linux system from accepting toomuch inserts? Jeff Janes
• 23:25   Re: How to prevent POSTGRES killing linux system from accepting toomuch inserts? Osahon Oduware
• 23:25   Re: How to prevent POSTGRES killing linux system from accepting toomuch inserts? Osahon Oduware

20 December 2019

• 08:21   Re: Consecutive Query Executions with Increasing Execution Time Shijia Wei
• 21:03   How to set parallel_tuple_cost Jeff Janes
• 21:42   Re: How to set parallel_tuple_cost Laurenz Albe
• 21:58   Re: How to set parallel_tuple_cost Tom Lane

21 December 2019

• 03:24   Re: How to set parallel_tuple_cost Andres Freund
• 04:37   Re: How to set parallel_tuple_cost Jeff Janes

26 December 2019

• 23:07   Merge join doesn't seem to break early when I (and planner) think itshould - 10.4 Timothy Garnett

27 December 2019

• 19:52   Re: Merge join doesn't seem to break early when I (and planner) thinkit should - 10.4 Jeff Janes