Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

1 August 2010

• 06:36   what does "initplan" operation in explain output mean? Mark Rostron
• 14:08   Re: what does "initplan" operation in explain output mean? Tom Lane

2 August 2010

• 14:26   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Merlin Moncure
• 14:58   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Yeb Havinga
• 16:45   Re: what does "initplan" operation in explain output mean? Mark Rostron
• 17:29   Re: what does "initplan" operation in explain output mean? Tom Lane
• 19:13   Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite Maciek Sakrejda
• 19:29   Re: Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite Kevin Grittner
• 19:42   Re: Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite Maciek Sakrejda
• 19:50   Re: Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite Kevin Grittner
• 19:53   Re: Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite Andres Freund
• 20:06   Re: Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite Maciek Sakrejda
• 20:15   Re: Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite Dave Crooke
• 20:22   Re: Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite Andres Freund
• 21:02   Re: Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite Maciek Sakrejda
• 21:03   Re: Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite Kevin Grittner
• 21:23   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Peter Hussey
• 21:24   Re: Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite Kevin Grittner
• 21:38   Re: Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite Kevin Grittner
• 22:19   Re: Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite Andres Freund
• 22:21   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Josh Berkus
• 22:37   Re: Optimizing NOT IN plans / verify rewrite Maciek Sakrejda

3 August 2010

• 00:08   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Greg Smith
• 00:14   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Scott Marlowe
• 02:49   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Robert Haas
• 02:55   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Tom Lane
• 08:38   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Yeb Havinga
• 11:18   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Yeb Havinga
• 14:02   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Greg Smith
• 15:35   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Yeb Havinga
• 16:28   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Merlin Moncure

4 August 2010

• 03:30   Re: Execution Plan Rodrigo E. De León Plicet
• 07:16   performance sol10 zone (fup) Heiko L.
• 10:50   How to improve: performance of query on postgresql 8.3 takes days Dino Vliet
• 10:51   Re: [GENERAL] How to improve: performance of query on postgresql 8.3 takes days John R Pierce
• 10:51   what does "initplan" operation in explain output mean? Mark Rostron
• 10:51   Re: [GENERAL] How to improve: performance of query on postgresql 8.3 takes days Alban Hertroys
• 10:51   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Hannu Krosing
• 10:51   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Hannu Krosing
• 13:14   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Robert Haas
• 13:16   Re: Strange explain on partitioned tables Robert Haas
• 14:01   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Kevin Grittner
• 16:34   LIKE without wildcard different from = Kevin Grittner
• 16:41   Re: LIKE without wildcard different from = Tom Lane
• 16:52   Re: LIKE without wildcard different from = Kevin Grittner
• 16:58   Re: LIKE without wildcard different from = Tom Lane
• 17:00   Re: LIKE without wildcard different from = Kevin Grittner
• 17:51   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Hannu Krosing
• 18:00   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Tom Lane
• 18:41   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Hannu Krosing
• 19:04   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Hannu Krosing
• 19:17   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Greg Smith
• 19:18   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Greg Smith
• 19:20   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Tom Lane
• 19:42   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Scott Carey
• 19:49   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Scott Carey
• 19:58   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Scott Carey
• 19:58   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Kevin Grittner
• 20:24   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Hannu Krosing
• 20:38   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Greg Smith
• 20:40   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Greg Smith
• 20:43   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Kevin Grittner
• 20:46   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Kevin Grittner

5 August 2010

• 00:07   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Hannu Krosing
• 00:10   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Hannu Krosing
• 02:50   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Chris Browne
• 02:51   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Chris Browne
• 12:40   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Brad Nicholson
• 17:50   vacuum performance on insert Sean Chen
• 17:57   Re: vacuum performance on insert Kevin Grittner
• 18:11   Re: vacuum performance on insert Tom Lane
• 18:28   Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Kenneth Cox
• 18:42   Two fast searches turn slow when used with OR clause Craig James
• 18:53   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Alan Hodgson
• 19:26   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Scott Marlowe
• 19:40   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Greg Smith
• 22:27   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Pierre C
• 23:00   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Craig James
• 23:09   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Scott Marlowe
• 23:13   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Dave Crooke
• 23:24   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Scott Marlowe
• 23:32   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Mark Kirkwood
• 23:58   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Alan Hodgson

6 August 2010

• 00:32   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Mark Kirkwood
• 00:35   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Mark Kirkwood
• 09:17   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Matthew Wakeling
• 16:40   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Scott Marlowe
• 17:59   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Scott Marlowe

7 August 2010

• 04:32   Re: vacuum performance on insert Sean Chen
• 16:31   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Justin Pitts
• 23:48   Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Michael March

8 August 2010

• 06:36   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Scott Carey
• 06:46   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Scott Carey
• 06:49   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Michael March
• 06:55   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Scott Marlowe
• 07:03   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Michael March
• 07:30   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Scott Marlowe
• 07:51   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Scott Marlowe
• 10:10   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Yeb Havinga

9 August 2010

• 14:03   Re: vacuum performance on insert Kevin Grittner
• 16:49   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Scott Carey
• 22:42   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Jeff Davis

10 August 2010

• 15:40   Sorted group by Matthew Wakeling
• 15:57   Re: Sorted group by Thomas Kellerer
• 16:03   Re: Sorted group by Matthew Wakeling
• 16:07   Re: Sorted group by Thom Brown
• 16:11   Re: Sorted group by hubert depesz lubaczewski
• 16:21   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Greg Smith
• 16:22   Re: Sorted group by Thomas Kellerer
• 16:27   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Greg Smith
• 16:29   Re: Sorted group by Thom Brown
• 16:37   Re: Sorted group by Kevin Grittner
• 17:53   Re: Sorted group by Jonathan Blitz
• 17:57   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Brad Nicholson
• 18:15   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Karl Denninger
• 18:23   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Scott Marlowe
• 18:29   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Greg Smith
• 18:39   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Karl Denninger
• 18:47   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Brad Nicholson
• 18:54   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Brad Nicholson
• 19:29   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Karl Denninger
• 19:51   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Brad Nicholson
• 19:52   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Scott Marlowe
• 20:00   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Christopher Browne
• 20:06   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Scott Marlowe

11 August 2010

• 13:46   Re: Sorted group by Matthew Wakeling
• 15:18   32 vs 64 bit build on Solaris Sparc Joseph Conway
• 15:23   Re: 32 vs 64 bit build on Solaris Sparc Tom Lane
• 15:54   Re: Sorted group by Alvaro Herrera
• 22:31   Re: Testing Sandforce SSD Bruce Momjian
• 23:05   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Scott Carey
• 23:10   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Scott Carey
• 23:52   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Scott Carey

12 August 2010

• 00:46   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Karl Denninger
• 00:54   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD 
• 01:42   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Bruce Momjian
• 02:39   Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem Robert Haas
• 03:17   Re: performance sol10 zone (fup) Robert Haas
• 04:12   Re: performance sol10 zone (fup) Scott Marlowe
• 04:31   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Greg Smith
• 04:49   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Greg Smith
• 07:29   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Arjen van der Meijden
• 07:32   Re: 32 vs 64 bit build on Solaris Sparc Dimitri
• 09:18   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Justin Pitts
• 12:35   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Brad Nicholson
• 17:37   Re: Slow function in queries SELECT clause. Davor J.
• 21:53   Very bad plan when using VIEW and IN (SELECT...*) Carlo Stonebanks
• 23:39   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Scott Carey

13 August 2010

• 05:59   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Arjen van der Meijden
• 06:07   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD Michael March
• 13:29   Re: Very bad plan when using VIEW and IN (SELECT...*) Kevin Grittner
• 14:51   Re: Very bad plan when using VIEW and IN (SELECT...*) Carlo Stonebanks
• 16:44   Can WINDOW be used? Greg Spiegelberg
• 18:17   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Bruce Momjian
• 18:41   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Greg Smith
• 21:17   Re: Can WINDOW be used? Josh Berkus

16 August 2010

• 16:38   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Scott Carey
• 17:46   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Greg Smith
• 20:02   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Andres Freund
• 20:13   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Greg Smith
• 20:18   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Andres Freund
• 20:54   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Greg Smith
• 21:06   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Andres Freund

17 August 2010

• 01:19   Very poor performance Aaron Burnett
• 01:31   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Bruce Momjian
• 01:51   Re: Very poor performance Mark Rostron
• 02:20   Re: Very poor performance Aaron Burnett
• 03:26   Quesion on the use of indexes Benjamin Krajmalnik
• 03:33   Re: Quesion on the use of indexes Tom Lane
• 08:29   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Greg Smith
• 08:42   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Greg Smith
• 09:37   Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance Andres Freund
• 10:33   Search query is curious 
• 10:45   Re: Search query is curious Thom Brown
• 10:49   Re: Search query is curious Pavel Stehule
• 14:18   Re: Very poor performance Kevin Grittner
• 15:08   Re: Quesion on the use of indexes Alvaro Herrera
• 15:16   Re: Search query is curious Maciek Sakrejda
• 15:28   Re: Quesion on the use of indexes 
• 15:43   Re: Very poor performance Kevin Grittner
• 15:57   Re: Very poor performance Tom Lane
• 16:21   Re: Very poor performance Mark Rostron
• 17:55   Re: Very poor performance Aaron Burnett
• 18:19   Re: Very poor performance Kevin Grittner
• 19:19   Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Alexandre de Arruda Paes
• 19:24   Re: Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Scott Marlowe
• 22:28   Re: Very poor performance Mark Kirkwood

18 August 2010

• 03:08   Re: Very poor performance Kevin Grittner
• 03:22   Re: Two fast searches turn slow when used with OR clause Robert Haas
• 06:37   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD david@lang.hm
• 11:49   Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD 
• 11:56   Re: Very poor performance Hannes Frederic Sowa
• 13:07   Fwd: Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Alexandre de Arruda Paes
• 13:22   Re: Fwd: Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Tom Lane
• 13:51   Are Indices automatically generated for primary keys? Clemens Eisserer
• 13:55   Re: Are Indices automatically generated for primary keys? hubert depesz lubaczewski
• 13:59   Re: Are Indices automatically generated for primary keys? Kevin Grittner
• 14:15   Re: Are Indices automatically generated for primary keys? Clemens Eisserer
• 14:24   Re: Are Indices automatically generated for primary keys? Kevin Grittner
• 14:53   Re: Are Indices automatically generated for primary keys? Kevin Grittner
• 15:08   Re: Are Indices automatically generated for primary keys? Justin Graf
• 15:24   Re: Are Indices automatically generated for primary keys? Thom Brown
• 19:24   write barrier question Samuel Gendler
• 19:57   Re: write barrier question Craig James
• 20:09   Copy performance issues s anwar
• 20:23   Re: write barrier question Yeb Havinga
• 22:05   Re: write barrier question Samuel Gendler
• 22:06   Re: write barrier question Samuel Gendler
• 22:17   Copy performance issues Saadat Anwar
• 22:42   Re: Copy performance issues Tom Lane
• 22:50   Re: Copy performance issues Greg Smith
• 23:00   Re: Copy performance issues s anwar

19 August 2010

• 05:24   in-memory sorting Samuel Gendler
• 05:46   Re: in-memory sorting Samuel Gendler
• 05:56   Re: in-memory sorting Pavel Stehule
• 06:14   yet another q Samuel Gendler
• 06:25   Re: in-memory sorting Scott Marlowe
• 06:39   Re: in-memory sorting Samuel Gendler
• 06:50   Re: yet another q Samuel Gendler
• 06:51   Re: yet another q Samuel Gendler
• 06:52   Re: in-memory sorting Scott Marlowe
• 07:06   Re: in-memory sorting Samuel Gendler
• 07:14   Re: in-memory sorting Samuel Gendler
• 07:17   Re: in-memory sorting Scott Marlowe
• 08:07   Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Philippe Rimbault
• 09:51   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Scott Marlowe
• 10:22   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Philippe Rimbault
• 12:28   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Philippe Rimbault
• 12:57   Re: Fwd: Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Alexandre de Arruda Paes
• 13:29   Re: in-memory sorting Tom Lane
• 13:41   Re: Fwd: Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Kevin Grittner
• 13:56   Re: Fwd: Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Tom Lane
• 16:28   Re: yet another q Tom Lane
• 16:59   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Scott Marlowe
• 18:25   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Greg Smith
• 18:31   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Greg Smith

20 August 2010

• 07:25   Re: Copy performance issues Sergey Konoplev

21 August 2010

• 08:25   Re: Fwd: Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Dimitri
• 08:58   Re: Fwd: Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Scott Marlowe
• 09:13   Re: Fwd: Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Dimitri
• 13:49   Re: Fwd: Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Alexandre de Arruda Paes

22 August 2010

• 11:35   Re: Fwd: Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Robert Haas
• 16:17   Re: Fwd: Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Dimitri
• 17:53   Re: Fwd: Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Greg Smith
• 18:01   Re: Fwd: Vacuum Full + Cluster + Vacuum full = non removable dead rows Greg Smith

23 August 2010

• 04:25   Inefficient query plan Jann Röder
• 05:51   Re: Inefficient query plan Scott Marlowe
• 05:52   Re: Inefficient query plan Scott Marlowe
• 10:16   Re: Inefficient query plan Jann Röder
• 10:18   Re: Inefficient query plan Scott Marlowe
• 10:25   Re: Inefficient query plan Jann Röder
• 12:08   Re: Inefficient query plan Kevin Grittner
• 12:10   Re: Inefficient query plan Kevin Grittner
• 13:19   Re: Inefficient query plan Jann Röder
• 13:37   Re: Inefficient query plan Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 13:52   Re: Inefficient query plan Kevin Grittner
• 13:56   Re: Inefficient query plan Kevin Grittner
• 14:12   Re: Inefficient query plan Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 14:21   Re: Inefficient query plan Kevin Grittner
• 14:39   Re: Inefficient query plan Alvaro Herrera
• 14:40   Re: Inefficient query plan Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 14:41   Re: Inefficient query plan Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 15:03   Re: Inefficient query plan Kevin Grittner
• 15:21   Re: Inefficient query plan Tom Lane
• 15:22   Re: Inefficient query plan 
• 16:20   Re: Inefficient query plan Scott Marlowe
• 18:42   Triggers or code? DM
• 19:14   Re: Triggers or code? André Fernandes
• 22:16   PARSE WAITING David Kerr
• 22:19   Re: PARSE WAITING David Kerr
• 22:24   Re: PARSE WAITING Alvaro Herrera
• 22:47   Re: PARSE WAITING David Kerr

24 August 2010

• 01:18   Re: PARSE WAITING Alvaro Herrera
• 13:03   Re: Inefficient query plan Jann Röder
• 13:24   Re: Inefficient query plan Jann Röder

25 August 2010

• 06:59   Re: Are Indices automatically generated for primary keys? Guillaume Lelarge
• 14:30   Re: Triggers or code? Bob Lunney
• 16:04   New servers, need suggestions for sensible tuning settings Bob Branch
• 16:25   Re: New servers, need suggestions for sensible tuning settings Kevin Grittner

26 August 2010

• 04:57   SubQuery Performance mike
• 05:24   Re: SubQuery Performance A. Kretschmer
• 10:33   turn off caching for performance test Willy-Bas Loos
• 16:50   Re: turn off caching for performance test Arjen van der Meijden
• 17:37   Re: turn off caching for performance test Pierre C
• 21:05   [Fwd: postgres 8.4.1 number of connections] Maria L. Wilson
• 21:13   Re: [Fwd: postgres 8.4.1 number of connections] Scott Marlowe

27 August 2010

• 00:03   Slow Query  Ozer, Pam
• 00:19   Re: Slow Query Scott Marlowe
• 00:19   Re: Slow Query Bob Lunney
• 01:06   Re: [Fwd: postgres 8.4.1 number of connections] Josh Berkus
• 04:30   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Scott Carey
• 07:54   Re: [Fwd: postgres 8.4.1 number of connections] Magnus Hagander
• 09:51   Re: turn off caching for performance test Willy-Bas Loos
• 14:17   Re: Slow Query Kevin Grittner
• 17:25   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Greg Smith
• 17:28   Re: turn off caching for performance test Greg Smith
• 17:31   Re: Slow Query Greg Smith
• 17:44   Re: Slow Query Ozer, Pam
• 17:58   Re: turn off caching for performance test Scott Marlowe

28 August 2010

• 00:21   Using Between Ozer, Pam
• 00:42   Re: Using Between Craig James
• 10:18   Re: write barrier question Cédric Villemain

29 August 2010

• 15:07   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
• 22:34   array can be slow when joining? Volodymyr Kostyrko

30 August 2010

• 04:07   Re: array can be slow when joining? Pavel Stehule
• 04:40   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Greg Smith
• 05:01   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Greg Smith
• 06:39   Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 Gerhard Wiesinger
• 07:00   Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 Scott Marlowe
• 07:22   Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 Andreas Kretschmer
• 07:25   Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 Gerhard Wiesinger
• 07:34   Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 Scott Marlowe
• 07:35   Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 Pavel Stehule
• 07:49   Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 Gerhard Wiesinger
• 07:55   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Yeb Havinga
• 07:57   Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 Gerhard Wiesinger
• 07:59   Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 Gerhard Wiesinger
• 08:18   Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 Pavel Stehule
• 08:28   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Scott Carey
• 10:54   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Scott Marlowe
• 12:49   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Yeb Havinga
• 13:51   GPU Accelerated Sorting Eliot Gable
• 14:05   Re: GPU Accelerated Sorting Greg Smith
• 15:15   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Greg Smith
• 15:16   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Greg Smith
• 15:29   Re: GPU Accelerated Sorting gael@pilotsystems.net (Gaël Le Mignot)
• 16:06   GPU Accelerated Sorting Eliot Gable
• 16:06   Re: [Fwd: postgres 8.4.1 number of connections] Maria L. Wilson
• 16:09   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
• 16:13   Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 Gerhard Wiesinger
• 16:23   Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 Tom Lane
• 16:46   Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 Gerhard Wiesinger
• 16:49   Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 Tom Lane
• 16:51   Re: Using Between Ozer, Pam
• 18:49   Re: GPU Accelerated Sorting Eliot Gable
• 19:23   Re: GPU Accelerated Sorting Yeb Havinga
• 20:42   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Clemens Eisserer
• 20:43   Re: GPU Accelerated Sorting Scott Marlowe
• 20:47   Re: GPU Accelerated Sorting David Boreham
• 22:02   Re: GPU Accelerated Sorting Jeff Davis
• 22:21   Re: GPU Accelerated Sorting Chris Browne
• 22:26   slow DDL creation Kevin Kempter
• 22:32   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Greg Smith
• 22:37   Re: GPU Accelerated Sorting David Boreham
• 23:04   Re: slow DDL creation bricklen

31 August 2010

• 00:31   Re: slow DDL creation David Fetter
• 01:17   Re: GPU Accelerated Sorting Scott Carey
• 01:29   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
• 01:59   Re: GPU Accelerated Sorting Tom Lane
• 12:45   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Yeb Havinga
• 15:33   Re: slow DDL creation Kevin Kempter
• 15:43   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Greg Smith
• 15:53   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
• 16:07   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Yeb Havinga
• 16:08   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
• 17:03   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Scott Marlowe
• 17:04   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Scott Marlowe
• 17:20   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Greg Smith
• 18:52   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Yeb Havinga
• 18:57   Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop Scott Marlowe