Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Christopher Browne
Subject Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD
Date
Msg-id AANLkTim+z+FV30=2g-RQMPirGQj27dUt+PjwaozENbwD@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote:
> My point being, no matter how terrible an idea a certain storage media
> is, there's always a use case for it.  Even if it's very narrow.

The trouble is, if extra subscribers induce load on the "master,"
which they presumably will, then that sliver of "use case" may very
well get obscured by the cost, such that the sliver should be treated
as not existing :-(.
--
http://linuxfinances.info/info/linuxdistributions.html

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD