Andres Freund wrote:
> A new checkpointing logic + a new syncing logic
> (prepare_fsync() earlier and then fsync() later) would be a nice
> thing. Do you plan to work on that?
>
The background writer already caches fsync calls into a queue, so the
prepare step you're thinking needs to be there is already. The problem
is that the actual fsync calls happen in a tight loop. That we're busy
fixing.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us
