Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

29 May 2017

• 00:16   [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax for NumericOnly grammar production Tom Lane
• 01:17   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths Mark Kirkwood
• 04:33   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all these months Jeff Janes
• 04:47   Re: [HACKERS] Extra Vietnamese unaccent rules Thomas Munro
• 07:26   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths Erik Rijkers
• 07:44   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths Erik Rijkers
• 08:06   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths Mark Kirkwood
• 08:09   [HACKERS] psql: Activate pager only for height, not width Brendan Jurd
• 08:12   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths Mark Kirkwood
• 08:50   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Amit Khandekar
• 09:20   Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes Konstantin Knizhnik
• 09:55   Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning Beena Emerson
• 10:04   [HACKERS] "cannot specify finite value after UNBOUNDED" ... uh, why? Tom Lane
• 10:25   [HACKERS] Macros bundling RELKIND_* conditions Ashutosh Bapat
• 11:18   [HACKERS] pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against older version of PGdata directory tushar
• 11:57   Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning Jeevan Ladhe
• 11:58   Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning Jeevan Ladhe
• 12:26   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Amit Kapila
• 12:40   Re: [HACKERS] pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against olderversion of PG data directory Amit Kapila
• 12:45   Re: [HACKERS] "cannot specify finite value after UNBOUNDED" ... uh,why? Amit Langote
• 12:50   Re: [HACKERS] pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against olderversion of PG data directory tushar
• 12:52   Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range Jeevan Ladhe
• 12:53   Re: [HACKERS] Allow GiST opcalsses without compress\decompres functions Andrew Borodin
• 13:00   Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken) Amit Kapila
• 13:19   Re: [HACKERS] pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against olderversion of PG data directory Amit Kapila
• 14:13   Re: [HACKERS] fix side-effect in get_qual_for_list() Jeevan Ladhe
• 14:14   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths Petr Jelinek
• 16:11   [HACKERS] question about replication docs Dave Cramer
• 16:31   Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax for NumericOnly grammar production Vik Fearing
• 17:04   [HACKERS] Fix a typo in execExpr.c Masahiko Sawada
• 17:30   Re: [HACKERS] Fix a typo in execExpr.c Magnus Hagander
• 18:22   Re: [HACKERS] Extra Vietnamese unaccent rules Dang Minh Huong
• 18:45   Re: [HACKERS] pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against older version of PG data directory Tom Lane
• 18:45   Re: [HACKERS] pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against olderversion of PG data directory Michael Paquier
• 18:58   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus buildfailure on s390x Christoph Berg
• 19:00   Re: [HACKERS] pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against older version of PG data directory Tom Lane
• 19:03   Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning Jeevan Ladhe
• 19:55   Re: [HACKERS] pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against olderversion of PG data directory Michael Paquier
• 20:02   Re: [HACKERS] pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against older version of PG data directory Tom Lane
• 20:05   Re: [HACKERS] pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against olderversion of PG data directory Michael Paquier
• 20:21   Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes Christoph Berg
• 21:25   Re: [HACKERS] fix side-effect in get_qual_for_list() Tom Lane
• 21:38   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication busy-waiting on a lock Jeff Janes
• 21:40   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication busy-waiting on a lock Andres Freund
• 21:42   Re: [HACKERS] fix side-effect in get_qual_for_list() Jeevan Ladhe
• 21:53   [HACKERS] Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces Bruce Momjian
• 21:58   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication busy-waiting on a lock Petr Jelinek
• 21:59   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication busy-waiting on a lock Andres Freund
• 22:08   Re: [HACKERS] Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces Claudio Freire
• 22:14   Re: [HACKERS] psql: Activate pager only for height, not width Jeff Janes
• 22:15   Re: [HACKERS] Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces Alvaro Herrera
• 22:21   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication busy-waiting on a lock Petr Jelinek
• 22:23   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication busy-waiting on a lock Andres Freund
• 22:24   Re: [HACKERS] Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces Andres Freund
• 22:25   Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes Sven R. Kunze
• 22:25   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication busy-waiting on a lock Petr Jelinek
• 22:26   Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes Sven R. Kunze
• 22:27   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication busy-waiting on a lock Petr Jelinek
• 22:28   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication busy-waiting on a lock Andres Freund
• 22:30   Re: [HACKERS] psql: Activate pager only for height, not width Christoph Berg
• 22:41   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication busy-waiting on a lock Petr Jelinek
• 22:44   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication busy-waiting on a lock Andres Freund
• 22:45   Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus build failure on s390x Tom Lane
• 22:55   Re: [HACKERS] Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces Tom Lane