Would someone please defend the restrictions imposed by the
"seen_unbounded" checks in transformPartitionBound
(parse_utilcmd.c:3365..3396 in current HEAD)? They sure look to me like
nothing but sloppy thinking, and/or protection of downstream sloppy
thinking. Why should the boundedness of one partitioning column's
range matter to any other partitioning column's range?
regards, tom lane