Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

27 September 2012

• 00:55   Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) Alvaro Herrera
• 00:56   EVENT Keyword and CREATE TABLE Brian Weaver
• 01:06   Re: system_information.triggers & truncate triggers Gavin Flower
• 01:48   Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system Tomas Vondra
• 02:53   Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system Tomas Vondra
• 03:21   Re: Does the SQL standard actually define LATERAL anywhere? Peter Eisentraut
• 03:24   Re: EVENT Keyword and CREATE TABLE Tom Lane
• 03:48   Re: Switching timeline over streaming replication Josh Berkus
• 03:55   Re: Does the SQL standard actually define LATERAL anywhere? Tom Lane
• 04:00   Re: Switching timeline over streaming replication Josh Berkus
• 04:16   Modest proposal: run check_keywords.pl on every build Tom Lane
• 04:17   Re: Switching timeline over streaming replication md@rpzdesign.com
• 05:01   Re: Modest proposal: run check_keywords.pl on every build Andrew Dunstan
• 05:06   Re: pg_upgrade does not completely honor --new-port Bruce Momjian
• 06:41   Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation Noah Misch
• 07:01   Re: 64-bit API for large object Kohei KaiGai
• 07:06   Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) Kohei KaiGai
• 07:31   Re: Switching timeline over streaming replication Amit Kapila
• 07:48   Re: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation Tom Lane
• 08:52   Re: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation Amit Kapila
• 11:22   Re: Oid registry Daniel Farina
• 11:44   Re: Switching timeline over streaming replication Hannu Krosing
• 11:57   Re: EVENT Keyword and CREATE TABLE Dimitri Fontaine
• 12:51   Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system Simon Riggs
• 13:42   Re: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:09   Re: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation Amit Kapila
• 16:22   Re: data to json enhancements Robert Haas
• 16:25   Re: system_information.triggers & truncate triggers Robert Haas
• 16:28   Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation Amit Kapila
• 16:29   Re: Modest proposal: run check_keywords.pl on every build Robert Haas
• 16:52   Re: data to json enhancements Merlin Moncure
• 17:00   Re: [v9.3] Extra Daemons (Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database) Alvaro Herrera
• 17:09   Re: data to json enhancements Andrew Dunstan
• 17:36   Re: data to json enhancements Tom Lane
• 17:37   Re: data to json enhancements Robert Haas
• 17:42   Re: data to json enhancements Misa Simic
• 17:57   Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system Alvaro Herrera
• 18:00   psql, remove include of psqlscan.c Karl O. Pinc
• 18:07   Re: psql, remove include of psqlscan.c Tom Lane
• 18:30   Re: psql, remove include of psqlscan.c Karl O. Pinc
• 18:41   Re: psql, remove include of psqlscan.c Alvaro Herrera
• 18:48   Re: psql, remove include of psqlscan.c John R Pierce
• 18:58   Re: XLogInsert scaling, revisited Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:02   Re: psql, remove include of psqlscan.c Tom Lane
• 19:52   Re: Oid registry Robert Haas
• 19:57   Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys Noah Misch
• 20:08   Re: Oid registry David Johnston
• 21:02   Re: psql, remove include of psqlscan.c Karl O. Pinc
• 21:06   Re: psql, remove include of psqlscan.c Karl O. Pinc
• 21:34   Re: Oid registry Magnus Hagander
• 21:50   Re: patch: shared session variables Pavel Stehule
• 22:10   Re: proposal - assign result of query to psql variable Pavel Stehule
• 22:28   Re: psql, remove include of psqlscan.c Tom Lane
• 22:35   Re: pg_signal_backend() asymmetry Alvaro Herrera
• 22:37   Re: psql, remove include of psqlscan.c Tom Lane
• 23:02   Re: Oid registry Robert Haas
• 23:06   Re: psql, remove include of psqlscan.c Karl O. Pinc
• 23:07   Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system Simon Riggs
• 23:08   Re: Oid registry Magnus Hagander
• 23:19   Re: data to json enhancements Andrew Dunstan
• 23:38   Re: ALTER command reworks Alvaro Herrera
• 23:59   Re: ToDo: allow to get a number of processed rows by COPY statement [Review of Patch] Pavel Stehule