Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMJMibhhnDf3sh+UzWE5RyniZrR0cuQaj=byjMpdJYUVyQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 26 September 2012 15:47, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> Really, as far as autovacuum is concerned, it would be much more useful
> to be able to reliably detect that a table has been recently vacuumed,
> without having to request a 10ms-recent pgstat snapshot.  That would
> greatly reduce the amount of time autovac spends on pgstat requests.

VACUUMing generates a relcache invalidation. Can we arrange for those
invalidations to be received by autovac launcher, so it gets immediate
feedback of recent activity without polling?

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: EVENT Keyword and CREATE TABLE
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation