Mailing lists [pgsql-bugs]

25 February 2010

• 01:18   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Alex Hunsaker
• 02:01   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Alex Hunsaker
• 02:21   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Tom Lane
• 02:38   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Alex Hunsaker
• 02:49   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Alex Hunsaker
• 02:58   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Tom Lane
• 03:23   Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required? Tom Lane
• 04:02   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Alex Hunsaker
• 05:03   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) David E. Wheeler
• 05:36   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Alex Hunsaker
• 07:26   Re: BUG #5338: PG_DUMP fails due to invalid adnum value Toni Helenius
• 07:27   Re: BUG #5345: non-administrator users cannot create databases with special encoding Kovács Zoltán
• 08:41   Re: BUG #5314: Error in nested composite types in plpgsql. Oleg Serov
• 13:39   Re: BUG #5345: non-administrator users cannot create databases with special encoding Tom Lane
• 14:09   Re: BUG #5346: PostgresSQL ODBC 64 bits download Jan-Ivar Mellingen
• 17:01   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Tim Bunce
• 17:05   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) David E. Wheeler
• 17:17   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) David E. Wheeler
• 17:32   Re: to_timestamp error handling. Bruce Momjian
• 18:15   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Alex Hunsaker
• 18:22   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Tom Lane
• 18:30   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Alex Hunsaker
• 18:32   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) David E. Wheeler
• 18:48   Re: BUG #5338: PG_DUMP fails due to invalid adnum value Robert Haas
• 18:54   Re: BUG #5314: Error in nested composite types in plpgsql. Robert Haas
• 19:00   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Greg Sabino Mullane
• 19:02   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Alex Hunsaker
• 19:04   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Alex Hunsaker
• 19:13   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Alex Hunsaker
• 19:58   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Tim Bunce
• 20:06   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) David E. Wheeler
• 20:07   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Tom Lane
• 20:08   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Alex Hunsaker
• 20:10   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) David E. Wheeler
• 21:16   Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) Tim Bunce
• 21:29   Re: BUG #4806: Bug with GiST index and empty integer array? Bruce Momjian
• 22:29   Re: BUG #4769: xmlconcat produces invalid xml values -> data corruption Bruce Momjian