Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Alex Hunsaker
Subject Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date
Msg-id 34d269d41002251211j70a1a46dr6c91efbe57796828@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  (Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 13:03, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:59, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> wrote:
>> Just don't break anything in 9.0 that relies on plperl please. :) To that
>> end, let me know when HEAD has something somewhat stable, and I'll
>> run some tests against it (e.g. Bucardo, which uses lots of plperl)
>
> Defiantly, the goal is to not break anything :).

Err oops, as David Fetter pointed out... I *think* i meant to say definitely.

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Next
From: Tim Bunce
Date:
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)