On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ISTM the easiest and safest fix would be to not allow recursive plperl
>> creations. You could still call plperl functions within functions,
>> just not if they are not defined. This limitation really blows
>
> That's the understatement of the month. What you're saying, IIUC, is
> that if function A calls function B via a SPI command, and B wasn't
> executed previously in the current session, it would fail? Seems
> entirely unacceptable.
Exactly what I was thinking. This "fix" is right out.
Best,
David
