Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Alex Hunsaker
Subject Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date
Msg-id 34d269d41002242234h20b16750t87bba62c681bad4a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  (Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 22:01, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok I can get behind this. =C2=A0I did some testing and we could probably
> even store less than than that if we could do the equivalent of:
> Safe->share('::mksafefunc');
> pl_perl_createsub()
> Safe->unshare('::mksafefunc');

On 2nd thought this basically requires your fix anyway.  To make it so
you can share something in safe from within safe means we will need to
enable more opcodes there... so it would end up being the same
solution.

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Next
From: Toni Helenius
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5338: PG_DUMP fails due to invalid adnum value